» Articles » PMID: 26673811

Ibrutinib Versus Temsirolimus in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle-cell Lymphoma: an International, Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3 Study

Abstract

Background: Mantle-cell lymphoma is an aggressive B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Both ibrutinib and temsirolimus have shown single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. We undertook a phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib versus temsirolimus in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.

Methods: This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma confirmed by central pathology in 21 countries who had received one or more rituximab-containing treatments. Patients were stratified by previous therapy and simplified mantle-cell lymphoma international prognostic index score, and were randomly assigned with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive daily oral ibrutinib 560 mg or intravenous temsirolimus (175 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1; 75 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of subsequent 21-day cycles). Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by a masked independent review committee with the primary hypothesis that ibrutinib compared with temsirolimus significantly improves progression-free survival. The analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT01646021) and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT (number 2012-000601-74).

Findings: Between Dec 10, 2012, and Nov 26, 2013, 280 patients were randomised to ibrutinib (n=139) or temsirolimus (n=141). Primary efficacy analysis showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (p<0·0001) for patients treated with ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (hazard ratio 0·43 [95% CI 0·32-0·58]; median progression-free survival 14·6 months [95% CI 10·4-not estimable] vs 6·2 months [4·2-7·9], respectively). Ibrutinib was better tolerated than temsirolimus, with grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events reported for 94 (68%) versus 121 (87%) patients, and fewer discontinuations of study medication due to adverse events for ibrutinib versus temsirolimus (9 [6%] vs 36 [26%]).

Interpretation: Ibrutinib treatment resulted in significant improvement in progression-free survival and better tolerability versus temsirolimus in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. These data lend further support to the positive benefit-risk ratio for ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma.

Funding: Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Citing Articles

Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and potential mechanism of ibrutinib-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

Pan Y, Zhao Y, Ren H, Wang X, Liu C, Du B Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1513913.

PMID: 39629084 PMC: 11611568. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1513913.


Therapeutic advances in the targeting of ROR1 in hematological cancers.

Tigu A, Munteanu R, Moldovan C, Rares D, Kegyes D, Tomai R Cell Death Discov. 2024; 10(1):471.

PMID: 39551787 PMC: 11570672. DOI: 10.1038/s41420-024-02239-1.


"The End of the Golden Weather": therapeutic strategies for mantle cell lymphoma relapsed or refractory to covalent BTK inhibitors.

Grainger B, Cheah C Haematologica. 2024; 110(3):576-587.

PMID: 39540208 PMC: 11873701. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.286205.


BTKi combined with chemical immunotherapy in the initial treatment of aggressive mantle cell lymphoma: A retrospective study.

Ju Q, Li Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(43):e40197.

PMID: 39470506 PMC: 11520990. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040197.


Impact of PIK3CA gain and PTEN loss on mantle cell lymphoma biology and sensitivity to targeted therapies.

Bettazova N, Senavova J, Kupcova K, Sovilj D, Rajmonova A, Andera L Blood Adv. 2024; 8(20):5279-5289.

PMID: 39158100 PMC: 11497468. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013205.