» Articles » PMID: 26669566

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Serious Infections with Tofacitinib and Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drug Treatment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2015 Dec 17
PMID 26669566
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tofacitinib modulates the signaling of cytokines that are integral to lymphocyte activation, proliferation, and function. Thus, tofacitinib therapy may result in suppression of multiple elements of the immune response. Serious infections have been reported in tofacitinib RA trials. However, limited head-to-head comparator data were available within the tofacitinib RA development program to directly compare rates of serious infections with tofacitinib relative to biologic agents, and specifically adalimumab (employed as an active control agent in two randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib).

Methods: A systematic literature search of data from interventional randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies with biologics in RA was carried out. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) consensus was followed for reporting results of the review and meta-analysis. Incidence rates (unique patients with events/100 patient-years) for each therapy were estimated based on data from randomized controlled trials and long-term extension studies using a random-effects model. Relative and absolute risk comparisons versus placebo used Mantel-Haenszel methods.

Results: The search produced 657 hits. In total, 66 randomized controlled trials and 22 long-term extension studies met the selection criteria. Estimated incidence rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were 3.04 (2.49, 3.72), 3.72 (2.99, 4.62), 5.45 (4.26, 6.96), and 4.90 (4.41, 5.44), respectively. Incidence rates (95% CIs) for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) in phase 3 trials were 3.02 (2.25, 4.05) and 3.00 (2.24, 4.02), respectively. Corresponding incidence rates in long-term extension studies were 2.50 (2.05, 3.04) and 3.19 (2.74, 3.72). The risk ratios (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 2.21 (0.60, 8.14) and 2.02 (0.56, 7.28), respectively. Risk differences (95% CIs) versus placebo for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID were 0.38% (-0.24%, 0.99%) and 0.40% (-0.22%, 1.02%), respectively.

Conclusions: In interventional studies, the risk of serious infections with tofacitinib is comparable to published rates for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with moderate to severely active RA.

Citing Articles

Assessment of IL-6 Pathway Inhibition in Gastrointestinal Behçet's Disease from Immunological and Clinical Perspectives.

Naganuma M, Takeno M, Celik A, Moots R, Pinton P, Hisamatsu T Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857830 PMC: 11761229. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010247.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of Tocilizumab compared to Adalimumab in the treatment of severe active rheumatoid arthritis in Iran.

Metghalchi Y, Yaghoubi N, Yousefi N, Ahmadi R, Kargar A, Zargaran M Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024; 22(1):82.

PMID: 39538256 PMC: 11562510. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00592-7.


Geographical Differences in the Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib Versus TNFi: A Post Hoc Analysis of ORAL Surveillance.

Batko B, Jeka S, Wiland P, Zielinska A, Stopinska-Polaszewska M, Stajszczyk M Rheumatol Ther. 2024; 11(5):1217-1235.

PMID: 39060905 PMC: 11422304. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00693-y.


Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.

Mansilla-Polo M, Morgado-Carrasco D Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024; 14(8):1983-2038.

PMID: 39014279 PMC: 11333430. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-024-01203-2.


Incidence Rates of Infections in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Janus Kinase or Interleukin-6 Inhibitors: Results of a Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.

Yoshida S, Miyata M, Suzuki E, Kanno T, Sumichika Y, Saito K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 38792541 PMC: 11122599. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13103000.


References
1.
Cohen S, Radominski S, Gomez-Reino J, Wang L, Krishnaswami S, Wood S . Analysis of infections and all-cause mortality in phase II, phase III, and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014; 66(11):2924-37. DOI: 10.1002/art.38779. View

2.
Lee E, Fleischmann R, Hall S, Wilkinson B, Bradley J, Gruben D . Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(25):2377-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310476. View

3.
Singh J, Cameron C, Noorbaloochi S, Cullis T, Tucker M, Christensen R . Risk of serious infection in biological treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015; 386(9990):258-65. PMC: 4580232. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61704-9. View

4.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

5.
Lan J, Chou S, Chen D, Chen Y, Hsieh T, Young Jr M . A comparative study of etanercept plus methotrexate and methotrexate alone in Taiwanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004; 103(8):618-23. View