Quantitative Fetal Fibronectin Testing in Combination with Cervical Length Measurement in the Prediction of Spontaneous Preterm Delivery in Symptomatic Women
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To evaluate whether in symptomatic women, the combination of quantitative fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing and cervical length (CL) improves the prediction of preterm delivery (PTD) within 7 days compared with qualitative fFN and CL.
Design: Post hoc analysis of frozen fFN samples of a nationwide cohort study.
Setting: Ten perinatal centres in the Netherlands.
Population: Symptomatic women between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation.
Methods: The risk of PTD <7 days was estimated in predefined CL and fFN strata. We used logistic regression to develop a model including quantitative fFN and CL, and one including qualitative fFN (threshold 50 ng/ml) and CL. We compared the models' capacity to identify women at low risk (<5%) for delivery within 7 days using a reclassification table.
Main Outcome Measures: Spontaneous delivery within 7 days after study entry.
Results: We studied 350 women, of whom 69 (20%) delivered within 7 days. The risk of PTD in <7 days ranged from 2% in the lowest fFN group (<10 ng/ml) to 71% in the highest group (>500 ng/ml). Multivariable logistic regression showed an increasing risk of PTD in <7 days with rising fFN concentration [10-49 ng/ml: odds ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.23-7.0; 50-199 ng/ml: OR 3.2, 95% CI 0.79-13; 200-499 ng/ml: OR 9.0, 95% CI 2.3-35; >500 ng/ml: OR 39, 95% CI 9.4-164] and shortening of the CL (OR 0.86 per mm, 95% CI 0.82-0.90). Use of quantitative fFN instead of qualitative fFN resulted in reclassification of 18 (5%) women from high to low risk, of whom one (6%) woman delivered within 7 days.
Conclusion: In symptomatic women, quantitative fFN testing does not improve the prediction of PTD within 7 days compared with qualitative fFN testing in combination with CL measurement in terms of reclassification from high to low (<5%) risk, but it adds value across the risk range.
Tweetable Abstract: Quantitative fFN testing adds value to qualitative fFN testing with CL measurement in the prediction of PTD.
Wendremaire M, Hadi T, Lopez T, Guy J, Neiers F, Garrido C Am J Reprod Immunol. 2024; 92(6):e70015.
PMID: 39625044 PMC: 11613301. DOI: 10.1111/aji.70015.
Ferrer-Marquez F, Astudillo R, Carvajal J AJOG Glob Rep. 2024; 4(2):100345.
PMID: 38681954 PMC: 11046293. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100345.
Oh K, Romero R, Kim H, Lee J, Hong J, Yoon B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(26):10514-10529.
PMID: 36229038 PMC: 10544756. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2131388.
Stock S, Horne M, Bruijn M, White H, Boyd K, Heggie R PLoS Med. 2021; 18(7):e1003686.
PMID: 34228732 PMC: 8259998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003686.
Mahomed K, Ibiebele I, Fraser C, Brown C Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019; 4:100079.
PMID: 31508583 PMC: 6726917. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100079.