» Articles » PMID: 26664864

Unicuspid Aortic Stenosis in a Patient with Turner Syndrome: A Case Report

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 15
PMID 26664864
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Congenital aortic valve anomalies are the cause of premature aortic stenosis in pediatric and younger adult populations. Despite being very rare, unicuspid aortic valves account for approximately 5% of isolated aortic valve replacements. Patients with aortic stenosis, present with the same symptomatology independent of leaflet morphology. However, the presence of bicuspid and unicuspid aortic stenosis is associated with a higher incidence of aortopathy, especially in Turner syndrome patients. Turner syndrome, an X monosomy, is associated with aortic valve anomalies, aortopathy, and hypertension. These risk factors lead to a higher incidence of aortic dissection in this population. Patients with Turner syndrome and aortic stenosis that present for aortic valve replacement should therefore undergo extensive aortic imaging prior to surgery. Transthoracic echocardiography is the diagnostic tool of choice for valvular pathology, yet it can misdiagnose unicuspid aortic valves as bicuspid valves due to certain similarities on imaging. Transesophageal echocardiography is a better tool for distinguishing between the two valvular abnormalities, although diagnostic errors can still occur. We present a case of a 50-year-old female with history of Turner syndrome and bicuspid aortic stenosis presenting for aortic valve replacement and ascending aorta replacement. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed a stenotic unicommissural unicuspid aortic valve with an eccentric orifice, which was missed on preoperative imaging. This case highlights the importance of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in confirming preoperative findings, diagnosing further cardiac pathology, and ensuring adequate surgical repair.

Citing Articles

Turner syndrome, unicuspid aortopathy, and pregnancy: Difficult decisions for complex scenarios.

Martin M, Adeba A, De la Hera J, Martinez J, Cigarran H, Alvarez-Cabo R Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021; 91(2):252-254.

PMID: 33887751 PMC: 8295873. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.20000176.

References
1.
Carlson M, Airhart N, Lopez L, Silberbach M . Moderate aortic enlargement and bicuspid aortic valve are associated with aortic dissection in Turner syndrome: report of the international turner syndrome aortic dissection registry. Circulation. 2012; 126(18):2220-6. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.088633. View

2.
Dweck M, Boon N, Newby D . Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(19):1854-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.093. View

3.
Chenot F, Montant P, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Coche E . Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography. Radiology. 2009; 255(2):377-85. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.0000082294. View

4.
Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Hiraishi M, Miyoshi T, Tsuji T, Kaneko A . A case of unicommissural unicuspid aortic valve stenosis diagnosed by real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2011; 28(8):E172-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01452.x. View

5.
Hahn R, Abraham T, Adams M, Bruce C, Glas K, Lang R . Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26(9):921-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.009. View