Appropriateness of Knee MRI Prescriptions: Clinical, Economic and Technical Issues

Overview

Journal Radiol Med

Specialty Radiology

Date 2015 Dec 15

PMID 26661954

Citations 9

Authors

F M Solivetti

A Guerrisi

N Salducca

F Desiderio

D Graceffa

G Capodieci

P Romeo

I Sperduti

S Canitano

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Many studies show that a large portion of medical prescriptions for diagnostic examinations may be not useful for patient's management or unnecessary. Rapid technological advancement has made it possible for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be increasingly used all over the world, particularly for musculoskeletal disorders. The aim of this study was to assess the appropriateness of the knee MRI prescriptions.

Materials And Methods: A panel of experts found standard clinical practice guidelines in the management of knee disorders. Secondly, the finalized set of guidelines chosen was compared with the data of 400 patients who underwent previous knee MRIs, which were then reported in a specific questionnaire prepared by the authors. The rate of appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions was then calculated.

Results: Almost 21% of prescriptions were totally inappropriate, 18.8% were uncertain, and 60.2% could be considered totally appropriate. The most frequent prescription indication was for meniscal disorders that account for 26.8% of the total indications.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that approximately 40% of the total prescriptions were totally inappropriate or uncertain and that most of these were made by general practitioners. In light of these results, the economic impact of inappropriate prescriptions on the Italian healthcare system has to be seriously considered.

Citing Articles

Can MRI predict return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature.

DAmbrosi R, Sconfienza L, Albano D, Meena A, Abermann E, Fink C Radiol Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40063165 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-025-01973-5.

Lower extremity MRI: are their requests always appropriate in France?.

Degremont A, Lindecker-Cournil V, Bisquay C, Ertel-Pau V, Gabach P, Lecocq Teixeira S Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39903237 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11402-w.

The posterior cruciate ligament angle in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees: the effect of gender, age, time from injury and tibial slope.

Di Maria F, DAmbrosi R, Sconfienza L, Fusco S, Abermann E, Fink C Radiol Med. 2025; .

PMID: 39863738 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-025-01951-x.

Low-value MRI of the knee in Norway: a register-based study to identify the proportion of potentially low-value MRIs and estimate the related costs.

Hofmann B, Havik V, Andersen E, Brandsaeter I, Kjelle E BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e081860.

PMID: 38485174 PMC: 10941154. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081860.

Diagnostics of Articular Cartilage Damage Based on Generated Acoustic Signals Using ANN-Part II: Patellofemoral Joint.

Karpinski R, Krakowski P, Jonak J, Machrowska A, Maciejewski M, Nogalski A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(10).

PMID: 35632174 PMC: 9146478. DOI: 10.3390/s22103765.

References

Brouwers M, Kho M, Browman G, Burgers J, Cluzeau F, Feder G . AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010; 182(18):E839-42. PMC: 3001530. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. View

Tierney W, Miller M, McDonald C . The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(21):1499-504. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199005243222105. View

Ebrahimipour H, Mirfeizi S, Najar A, Kachooei A, Ariamanesh A, Ganji R . Developing an Appropriateness Criteria for Knee MRI Using the Rand Appropriateness Method (RAM)-2013. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2014; 2(1):47-51. PMC: 4151442. View

Bree R, Kazerooni E, Katz S . Effect of mandatory radiology consultation on inpatient imaging use. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996; 276(19):1595-8. View

Sardanelli F, Quarenghi M, Fausto A, Aliprandi A, Cuppone M . How many medical requests for US, body CT, and musculoskeletal MR exams in outpatients are inadequate?. Radiol Med. 2005; 109(3):229-33. View

Aagesen A, Melek M . Choosing the right diagnostic imaging modality in musculoskeletal diagnosis. Prim Care. 2013; 40(4):849-61, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.08.005. View

Halsted M, Froehle C . Design, implementation, and assessment of a radiology workflow management system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(2):321-7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.3122. View

Rao J, Kroenke K, Mihaliak K, Eckert G, Weinberger M . Can guidelines impact the ordering of magnetic resonance imaging studies by primary care providers for low back pain?. Am J Manag Care. 2002; 8(1):27-35. View

Levy G, Blachar A, Goldstein L, Paz I, Olsha S, Atar E . Nonradiologist utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria in a preauthorization center for MRI requests: applicability and effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(4):855-8. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1055. View

10.

Marshall N, Spooner M, Galvin P, Ti J, McElvaney N, Lee M . Informatics in radiology: evaluation of an e-learning platform for teaching medical students competency in ordering radiologic examinations. Radiographics. 2011; 31(5):1463-74. DOI: 10.1148/rg.315105081. View

11.

Emery D, Shojania K, Forster A, Mojaverian N, Feasby T . Overuse of magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Intern Med. 2013; 173(9):823-5. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3804. View

12.

Flandry F, Hommel G . Normal anatomy and biomechanics of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2011; 19(2):82-92. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e318210c0aa. View

13.

Cristofaro M, Busi Rizzi E, Schinina V, Chiappetta D, Angeletti C, Bibbolino C . Appropriateness: analysis of outpatient radiology requests. Radiol Med. 2011; 117(2):322-32. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0725-2. View

14.

Woodard P, Bluemke D, Cascade P, Finn J, Stillman A, Higgins C . ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Am Coll Radiol. 2007; 3(9):665-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.007. View

15.

Kerry S, Oakeshott P, Dundas D, Williams J . Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2000; 17(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.1.46. View

16.

Putz R . [Anatomy and biomechanics of the knee joint]. Radiologe. 1995; 35(2):77-86. View