» Articles » PMID: 26661037

Corpus Callosum Abnormalities: Neuroradiological and Clinical Correlations

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 15
PMID 26661037
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To study neuroradiological features in pediatric patients with corpus callosum abnormalities, using new functional subtyping for the corpus callosum, and to correlate the features with the clinical presentation.

Method: We performed a retrospective review of 125 patients with radiologically identified abnormalities of the corpus callosum seen between 1999 and 2012. The study reviewed clinical features, genetic etiology, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) results. We used a new functional classification for callosal abnormalities based on embryological and anatomical correlations with four classes: complete agenesis, anterior agenesis (rostrum, genu, body), posterior agenesis (isthmus, splenium), and complete hypoplasia (thinning). We also studied the presence of extracallosal abnormalities.

Results: The new functional callosal subtyping did not reveal significant differences between the various subtypes in association with neurological outcome; however, the presence of cardiac disease was found more frequently in the group with complete agenesis. Thirty-seven per cent (46/125) had identifiable causes: of these, 48% (22/46) had a monogenic disorder, 30% (14/46) had a pathogenic chromosomal copy-number variant detected by CMA or karyotype, and 22% (10/46) had a recognizable clinical syndrome for which no confirmatory genetic test was available (namely Aicardi syndrome/septo-optic dysplasia and Goldenhar syndrome). The diagnostic yield for a significant CMA change was 19%. The presence of Probst bundles was found to be associated with a better neurodevelopmental outcome.

Interpretation: The functional classification system alone 'without clinical data' cannot predict the functional outcome. The presence of extracallosal brain abnormalities and an underlying genetic diagnosis predicted a worse neurodevelopmental outcome. This study highlights the importance of CMA testing and cardiac evaluation as part of a routine screen.

Citing Articles

Anomalies of the Corpus Callosum in Prenatal Ultrasound: A Narrative Review for Diagnosis and Further Counseling.

Wu F, Chen C J Med Ultrasound. 2024; 32(2):99-103.

PMID: 38882617 PMC: 11175368. DOI: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_49_23.


Genetic etiology of agenesis of the corpus callosum: a retrospective single-center cohort analysis of 114 fetuses.

Yu H, Li J, Yang Q, Yang B, Li Y, Ren Y Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 310(1):181-194.

PMID: 38782764 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07544-9.


Fetal MRI Analysis of Corpus Callosal Abnormalities: Classification, and Associated Anomalies.

Marathu K, Vahedifard F, Kocak M, Liu X, Adepoju J, Bowker R Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396468 PMC: 10887608. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040430.


Demographic and clinical characteristics, seizure disorders, and antiepileptic drug usage in different types of corpus callosum disorders: a comparative study in children.

Fu R, Wu P, Chou I, Lin C, Hong S Ital J Pediatr. 2024; 50(1):20.

PMID: 38273353 PMC: 10809518. DOI: 10.1186/s13052-024-01589-x.


Brain plasticity following corpus callosum agenesis or loss: a review of the Probst bundles.

Lynton Z, Suarez R, Fenlon L Front Neuroanat. 2023; 17:1296779.

PMID: 38020213 PMC: 10657877. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1296779.