» Articles » PMID: 26653145

Identifying Vasopressor and Inotrope Use for Health Services Research

Overview
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2015 Dec 15
PMID 26653145
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale: Identifying vasopressor and inotrope (vasopressor) use from administrative claims data may provide an important resource to study the epidemiology of shock.

Objectives: Determine accuracy of identifying vasopressor use using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding.

Methods: Using administrative data enriched with pharmacy billing files (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, NC), we identified two cohorts: adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis from 2010 to 2013 or pulmonary embolism (PE) from 2008 to 2011. Vasopressor administration was obtained using pharmacy billing files (dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, milrinone, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, vasopressin) and compared with ICD-9-CM procedure code for vasopressor administration (00.17). We estimated performance characteristics of the ICD-9-CM code and compared patients' characteristics and mortality rates according to vasopressor identification method.

Measurements And Main Results: Using either pharmacy data or the ICD-9-CM procedure code, 29% of 541,144 patients in the sepsis cohort and 5% of 81,588 patients in the PE cohort were identified as receiving a vasopressor. In the sepsis cohort, the ICD-9-CM procedure code had low sensitivity (9.4%; 95% confidence interval, 9.2-9.5), which increased over time. Results were similar in the PE cohort (sensitivity, 5.8%; 95% confidence interval, 5.1-6.6). The ICD-9-CM code exhibited high specificity in the sepsis (99.8%) and PE (100%) cohorts. However, patients identified as receiving vasopressors by ICD-9-CM code had significantly higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality, had more acute organ failures, and were more likely hospitalized in the Northeast and West.

Conclusions: The ICD-9-CM procedure code for vasopressor administration has low sensitivity and selects for higher severity of illness in studies of shock. Temporal changes in sensitivity would likely make longitudinal shock surveillance using ICD-9-CM inaccurate.

Citing Articles

External validation of the hospital frailty risk score among older adults receiving mechanical ventilation.

Sy E, Kassir S, Mailman J, Sy S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):14621.

PMID: 36028750 PMC: 9418158. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18970-7.


Trends and outcomes of mechanically ventilated cirrhotic patients in the United States from 2005-2014.

Cheung K, Mailman J, Crawford J, Karvellas C, Sy E J Intensive Care Soc. 2022; 23(2):139-149.

PMID: 35615228 PMC: 9125446. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720985293.


Validation of the V49.86 Code for Do-Not-Resuscitate Status in Hospitalized Patients at a Single Academic Medical Center.

Fonseca L, Walkey A, Ma X, Hua M Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018; 15(10):1234-1237.

PMID: 29944385 PMC: 6321991. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201804-257RL.


Validation of the V66.7 Code for Palliative Care Consultation in a Single Academic Medical Center.

Hua M, Li G, Clancy C, Morrison R, Wunsch H J Palliat Med. 2016; 20(4):372-377.

PMID: 27925839 PMC: 5385421. DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0363.


Epidemiology of Vasopressin Use for Adults with Septic Shock.

Vail E, Gershengorn H, Hua M, Walkey A, Wunsch H Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13(10):1760-1767.

PMID: 27404213 PMC: 5122493. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-259OC.

References
1.
Iwashyna T, Odden A, Rohde J, Bonham C, Kuhn L, Malani P . Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis. Med Care. 2012; 52(6):e39-43. PMC: 3568444. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318268ac86. View

2.
Lauridsen M, Gammelager H, Schmidt M, Nielsen H, Christiansen C . Positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, diagnosis codes for cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and septic shock in the Danish National Patient Registry. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15:23. PMC: 4373092. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0013-2. View

3.
Nanchal R, Kumar G, Taneja A, Patel J, Deshmukh A, Tarima S . Pulmonary embolism: the weekend effect. Chest. 2012; 142(3):690-696. PMC: 4694190. DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-2663. View

4.
Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Vincent J, Sprung C, Moreno R, Ranieri V . Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(3):589-97. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000201896.45809.E3. View

5.
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi J . Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005; 43(11):1130-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83. View