» Articles » PMID: 26647748

Skinfold Thickness Affects the Isometric Knee Extension Torque Evoked by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 10
PMID 26647748
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Subcutaneous adipose tissue may influence the transmission of electrical stimuli through to the skin, thus affecting both evoked torque and comfort perception associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES). This could seriously affect the effectiveness of NMES for either rehabilitation or sports purposes.

Objective: To investigate the effects of skinfold thickness (SFT) on maximal NMES current intensity, NMES-evoked torque, and NMES-induced discomfort.

Method: First, we compared NMES current intensity, NMES-induced discomfort, and NMES-evoked torque between two subgroups of subjects with thicker (n=10; 20.7 mm) vs. thinner (n=10; 29.4 mm) SFT. Second, we correlated SFT to NMES current intensity, NMES-induced discomfort, and NMES-evoked knee extension torque in 20 healthy women. The NMES-evoked torque was normalized to the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque. The discomfort induced by NMES was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS).

Results: NMES-evoked torque was 27.5% lower in subjects with thicker SFT (p=0.01) while maximal current intensity was 24.2% lower in subjects with thinner SFT (p=0.01). A positive correlation was found between current intensity and SFT (r=0.540, p=0.017). A negative correlation was found between NMES-evoked torque and SFT (r=-0.563, p=0.012). No significant correlation was observed between discomfort scores and SFT (rs=0.15, p=0.53).

Conclusion: These results suggest that the amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue (as reflected by skinfold thickness) affected NMES current intensity and NMES-evoked torque, but had no effect on discomfort perception. Our findings may help physical therapists to better understand the impact of SFT on NMES and to design more rational stimulation strategies.

Citing Articles

Motorpoint Heatmap of the Hamstring Muscles to Facilitate Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Flodin J, Amiri P, Juthberg R, Ackermann P Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 53(3):612-621.

PMID: 39609344 PMC: 11835891. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03657-z.


Encoder-Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulator for Bilateral Wrist Activities-Design and Evaluation.

Solomons C, Shanmugasundaram V, Balasubramanian S Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(10).

PMID: 36290469 PMC: 9598413. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9100501.


Electrically Evoked Torque at Rest is Strongly Related to Quadriceps Muscle Size in Individuals with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Palmieri-Smith R, Garcia S, Rodriguez K, Krishnan C Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2022; 26(3):199-206.

PMID: 36060895 PMC: 9439261. DOI: 10.1080/1091367X.2021.2005602.


Knee extensor force production and discomfort during neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps with and without gluteal muscle co-stimulation.

Flodin J, Mikkelsen C, Ackermann P Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022; 122(6):1521-1530.

PMID: 35426510 PMC: 9132842. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-04949-9.


Using Portable Ultrasound to Monitor the Neuromuscular Reactivity to Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation.

Petras A, Dragoi R, Pupazan V, Dragoi M, Popa D, Neagu A Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33401607 PMC: 7824493. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010065.


References
1.
Maffiuletti N, Herrero A, Jubeau M, Impellizzeri F, Bizzini M . Differences in electrical stimulation thresholds between men and women. Ann Neurol. 2008; 63(4):507-12. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21346. View

2.
Delitto A, Rose S . Comparative comfort of three waveforms used in electrically eliciting quadriceps femoris muscle contractions. Phys Ther. 1986; 66(11):1704-7. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/66.11.1704. View

3.
Salvini T, Durigan J, Peviani S, Russo T . Effects of electrical stimulation and stretching on the adaptation of denervated skeletal muscle: implications for physical therapy. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012; 16(3):175-83. DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000027. View

4.
Milner M, Quanbury A, BASMAJIAN J . Force, pain and electrode size in the electrical stimulation of leg muscles. Nature. 1969; 223(5206):645. DOI: 10.1038/223645a0. View

5.
Bax L, Staes F, Verhagen A . Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005; 35(3):191-212. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002. View