» Articles » PMID: 26635878

Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib

Overview
Journal Adv Hematol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Hematology
Date 2015 Dec 5
PMID 26635878
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Few trial-based assessments of ruxolitinib in patients with lower-risk myelofibrosis (MF) have been conducted, and no studies have made such assessments in a real-world population. We assessed changes in spleen size and constitutional symptoms during ruxolitinib treatment using a retrospective, observational review of anonymized US medical record data of patients diagnosed with IPSS low-risk (n = 25) or intermediate-1-risk (n = 83) MF. The majority of patients were male (low risk, 60%; intermediate-1 risk, 69%). Most patients (92% and 77%) were still receiving ruxolitinib at the medical record abstraction date (median observation/exposure time, 8 months). The proportion of patients with moderate or severe palpable splenomegaly (≥10 cm) decreased from diagnosis (56%) to best response (12%). Fatigue was reported in 47% of patients and was the most common constitutional symptom. For most symptoms in both risk groups, shifts in the distribution of severity from more to less severe from diagnosis to best response were observed. Both patients with low-risk and intermediate-1-risk MF experienced a substantial decrease in spleen size with ruxolitinib treatment in real-world settings. For most symptoms examined, there were distinct improvements in the distribution of severity during ruxolitinib treatment. These findings suggest that patients with lower-risk MF may benefit clinically from ruxolitinib treatment.

Citing Articles

Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study.

Palandri F, Elli E, Morsia E, Benevolo G, Tiribelli M, Beggiato E Cancer. 2024; 130(24):4257-4266.

PMID: 39078647 PMC: 11585342. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35489.


Comparing the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System low-, intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis in JUMP, a Phase 3b, expanded-access study.

Passamonti F, Gupta V, Martino B, Foltz L, Zaritskey A, Al-Ali H Hematol Oncol. 2021; 39(4):558-566.

PMID: 34224180 PMC: 8518822. DOI: 10.1002/hon.2898.


Novel Therapies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Beyond JAK Inhibitors.

Economides M, Verstovsek S, Pemmaraju N Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019; 14(5):460-468.

PMID: 31372878 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-00538-4.


Current treatment algorithm for the management of patients with myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors, and beyond.

Harrison C, McLornan D Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2017; 2017(1):489-497.

PMID: 29222297 PMC: 6142531. DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.489.


Baseline factors associated with response to ruxolitinib: an independent study on 408 patients with myelofibrosis.

Palandri F, Palumbo G, Bonifacio M, Tiribelli M, Benevolo G, Martino B Oncotarget. 2017; 8(45):79073-79086.

PMID: 29108288 PMC: 5668021. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18674.


References
1.
Benjamini O, Jain P, Estrov Z, Kantarjian H, Verstovsek S . Therapeutic effects of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis without clinically significant splenomegaly. Blood. 2012; 120(13):2768-9. PMC: 4081400. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-446849. View

2.
Vannucchi A, Kantarjian H, Kiladjian J, Gotlib J, Cervantes F, Mesa R . A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015; 100(9):1139-45. PMC: 4800694. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2014.119545. View

3.
Harrison C, Kiladjian J, Al-Ali H, Gisslinger H, Waltzman R, Stalbovskaya V . JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):787-98. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110556. View

4.
Levine R, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert B, Wernig G, Huntly B . Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell. 2005; 7(4):387-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.023. View

5.
Scherber R, Dueck A, Johansson P, Barbui T, Barosi G, Vannucchi A . The Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF): international prospective validation and reliability trial in 402 patients. Blood. 2011; 118(2):401-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-328955. View