Explicit and Implicit Positive Alcohol Expectancies in Problem and Non-Problem Drinkers: Differences Across Age Groups from Young Adolescence to Adulthood

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2015 Dec 5

PMID 26635680

Citations 9

Authors

Aurelie Vilenne

Etienne Quertemont

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: Recent studies with animal models showed that the stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol change during the adolescent period. In humans, the stimulant effects of ethanol are most often indirectly recorded through the measurement of explicit and implicit alcohol effect expectancies. However, it is unknown how such implicit and explicit expectancies evolve with age in humans during adolescence.

Methods: Adolescent (13-16 year old), young adult (17-18 year old), and adult (35-55 year old) participants were recruited. On the basis of their score on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), they were classified as non-problem (AUDIT ≤ 7) or problem (AUDIT ≥ 11) drinkers. The participants completed the Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire (AEQ) and performed two unipolar Implicit Association Test (IAT) to assess implicit associations between alcohol and the concepts of "stimulation" and "sedation".

Results: Problem drinkers from the three age groups reported significantly higher positive alcohol expectancies than non-problem drinkers on all AEQ subscales. Positive alcohol explicit expectancies also gradually decreased with age, with adolescent problem drinkers reporting especially high positive expectancies. This effect was statistically significant for all positive expectancies, with the exception of relaxation expectancies that were only close to statistical significance. In contrast, stimulation and sedation alcohol implicit associations were not significantly different between problem and non-problem drinkers and did not change with age.

Conclusion: These results indicate that explicit positive alcohol effect expectancies predict current alcohol consumption levels, especially in adolescents. Positive alcohol expectancies also gradually decrease with age in the three cross-sectional groups of adolescents, young adults, and adults. This effect might be related to changes in the physiological response to alcohol.

Citing Articles

Drinking Expectancies among Chinese Young Adults: A Qualitative Study from Hong Kong.

Chan R, Dong D, Kim J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(19).

PMID: 36231162 PMC: 9565682. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911865.

Positive alcohol expectancy and resting-state functional connectivity of the insula in problem drinking.

Le T, Malone T, Li C Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022; 231:109248.

PMID: 34998254 PMC: 8881788. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109248.

Relations among Externalizing Behaviors, Alcohol Expectancies and Alcohol Use Problems in a Multi-Ethnic Sample of Middle and High School Students.

Regan T, Tubman J, Schwartz S Subst Abuse. 2020; 14:1178221820928427.

PMID: 32565675 PMC: 7285945. DOI: 10.1177/1178221820928427.

Alcohol Expectancy and Cerebral Responses to Cue-Elicited Craving in Adult Nondependent Drinkers.

Zhornitsky S, Zhang S, Ide J, Chao H, Wang W, Le T Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019; 4(5):493-504.

PMID: 30711509 PMC: 6500759. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.11.012.

Problem Drinking, Alcohol Expectancy, and Thalamic Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Nondependent Adult Drinkers.

Zhornitsky S, Ide J, Wang W, Chao H, Zhang S, Hu S Brain Connect. 2018; 8(8):487-502.

PMID: 30198312 PMC: 6207153. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2018.0633.

References

Robinson T, Berridge K . Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 363(1507):3137-46. PMC: 2607325. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0093. View

Fleming M, Barry K, MacDonald R . The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. Int J Addict. 1991; 26(11):1173-85. DOI: 10.3109/10826089109062153. View

Thush C, Wiers R . Explicit and implicit alcohol-related cognitions and the prediction of future drinking in adolescents. Addict Behav. 2006; 32(7):1367-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.09.011. View

Wiers R, van Woerden N, Smulders F, de Jong P . Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002; 111(4):648-658. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.648. View

Greenwald A, Nosek B, Banaji M . Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2):197-216. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197. View

Leigh B, Stacy A . Alcohol expectancies and drinking in different age groups. Addiction. 2004; 99(2):215-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00641.x. View

Grant B, Dawson D . Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. J Subst Abuse. 1997; 9:103-10. DOI: 10.1016/s0899-3289(97)90009-2. View

Didone V, Quoilin C, Tirelli E, Quertemont E . Parametric analysis of the development and expression of ethanol-induced behavioral sensitization in female Swiss mice: effects of dose, injection schedule, and test context. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008; 201(2):249-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1266-9. View

OMalley P, Johnston L, Bachman J . Alcohol use among adolescents. Alcohol Health Res World. 2005; 22(2):85-93. PMC: 6761813. View

10.

Brown S, Tate S, Vik P, Haas A, Aarons G . Modeling of alcohol use mediates the effect of family history of alcoholism on adolescent alcohol expectancies. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999; 7(1):20-7. DOI: 10.1037//1064-1297.7.1.20. View

11.

Van Den Wildenberg E, Beckers M, van Lambaart F, Conrod P, Wiers R . Is the strength of implicit alcohol associations correlated with alcohol-induced heart-rate acceleration?. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006; 30(8):1336-48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00161.x. View

12.

Baer J . Student factors: understanding individual variation in college drinking. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002; (14):40-53. DOI: 10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.40. View

13.

Faden V . Trends in initiation of alcohol use in the United States 1975 to 2003. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006; 30(6):1011-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00115.x. View

14.

Correa M, Arizzi M, Betz A, Mingote S, Salamone J . Locomotor stimulant effects of intraventricular injections of low doses of ethanol in rats: acute and repeated administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003; 170(4):368-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1557-0. View

15.

Southwick L, Steele C, Marlatt A, Lindell M . Alcohol-related expectancies: defined by phase of intoxication and drinking experience. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981; 49(5):713-21. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.49.5.713. View

16.

Jones B, Corbin W, Fromme K . A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption. Addiction. 2001; 96(1):57-72. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961575.x. View

17.

Stevenson R, Besheer J, Hodge C . Comparison of ethanol locomotor sensitization in adolescent and adult DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007; 197(3):361-70. PMC: 2531208. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-1038-y. View

18.

Wiers R, Hoogeveen K, Sergeant J, Gunning W . High- and low-dose alcohol-related expectancies and the differential associations with drinking in male and female adolescents and young adults. Addiction. 1997; 92(7):871-88. View

19.

King A, Houle T, de Wit H, Holdstock L, Schuster A . Biphasic alcohol response differs in heavy versus light drinkers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002; 26(6):827-35. View

20.

Stacy A . Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997; 106(1):61-73. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.1.61. View