» Articles » PMID: 26632460

[A Multicenter Comparison Study on the Detection of BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Domain Point Mutation]

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2015 Dec 4
PMID 26632460
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the accuracy and consistency of the detection of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain point mutation among different laboratories.

Methods: Every one of 6 laboratories prepared 10 cDNA samples from tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistant BCR-ABL (P210 or P190) positive patients'bone marrow or peripheral blood. Each cDNA sample was divided into 6 aliquots and delivered to the laboratories. All 6 laboratories tested BCR-ABL point mutations of 60 samples according to their own protocols. Peking University People's Hospital analyzed the comparison results based on both the reports and sequencing chromatogram from all laboratories.

Results: All laboratories reported the same nucleotide and corresponding amino acid mutations in 37 samples (61.7%). Of 60 samples, 53 had confirmed mutation types, and a total of 23 types were included; 1 had no mutation; mutation types of 6 samples could not be determined because of the big differences among chromatograms from different laboratories. Low percentages of mutants were significantly related to results inconsistency (P=0.008). Inconsistent result of one sample was caused by the unique chromatogram of the mutant L248V, and one by the non-coverage amplification of PCR product from different laboratories. Amplification was failed in 3 samples. Testing or sequencing mistakes occurred in 7 samples. The differences in the mutant percentages among laboratories were less than 20% in the 80.6% of samples with confirmed results. Low internal control gene copies (ABL<10 000) were significantly related to both failed amplification and big differences among chromatograms from different laboratories (P=0.005 and <0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Problems in the clinical routine detection of BCR-ABL point mutation could be exposed and improvement could be achieved by sample exchange and comparison. Low percentage of mutant is the main reason which causes the discrepancy of BCR-ABL point mutation results among different laboratories.

Citing Articles

[Current status and challenges of diagnosis and monitoring of hematologic malignancies].

Qin Y, Huang X Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016; 36(12):985-8.

PMID: 26759097 PMC: 7342313. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.12.001.

References
1.
Druker B, Guilhot F, OBrien S, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N . Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(23):2408-17. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa062867. View

2.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Grigg A, Arthur C, Taylor K . High frequency of point mutations clustered within the adenosine triphosphate-binding region of BCR/ABL in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who develop imatinib (STI571) resistance. Blood. 2002; 99(9):3472-5. DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.9.3472. View

3.
Wassmann B, Pfeifer H, Goekbuget N, Beelen D, Beck J, Stelljes M . Alternating versus concurrent schedules of imatinib and chemotherapy as front-line therapy for Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Blood. 2006; 108(5):1469-77. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4386. View

4.
Qin Y, Lin Z, Cen J, Li X, Li Q, Cheng H . [A multicenter study on the validation of conversion factor for the conversion of BCR-ABL (P210) transcript levels to the international scale in chronic myeloid leukemia]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014; 35(2):134-7. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2014.02.016. View

5.
Qin Y, Chen S, Jiang B, Jiang Q, Jiang H, Li J . Characteristics of BCR-ABL kinase domain point mutations in Chinese imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Ann Hematol. 2010; 90(1):47-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00277-010-1039-5. View