» Articles » PMID: 26628922

A Rapid Passage Through a Two-active-X-chromosome State Accompanies the Switch of Imprinted X-inactivation Patterns in Mouse Trophoblast Stem Cells

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Biochemistry
Genetics
Date 2015 Dec 3
PMID 26628922
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In female mice, while the presence of two-active X-chromosomes characterises pluripotency, it is not tolerated in most other cellular contexts. In particular, in the trophoblastic lineage, impairment of paternal X (X(P)) inactivation results in placental defects.

Results: Here, we show that Trophoblast Stem (TS) cells can undergo a complete reversal of imprinted X-inactivation without detectable change in cell-type identity. This reversal occurs through a reactivation of the X(P) leading to TS clones showing two active Xs. Intriguingly, within such clones, all the cells rapidly and homogeneously either re-inactivate the X(P) or inactivate, de novo, the X(M).

Conclusion: This secondary non-random inactivation suggests that the two-active-X states in TS and in pluripotent contexts are epigenetically distinct. These observations also reveal a pronounced plasticity of the TS epigenome allowing TS cells to dramatically and accurately reprogram gene expression profiles. This plasticity may serve as a back-up system when X-linked mono-allelic gene expression is perturbed.

Citing Articles

Initiation of X Chromosome Inactivation during Bovine Embryo Development.

Yu B, van Tol H, Stout T, Roelen B Cells. 2020; 9(4).

PMID: 32325818 PMC: 7226380. DOI: 10.3390/cells9041016.


Involvement of X-chromosome Reactivation in Augmenting Cancer Testis Antigens Expression: A Hypothesis.

Liu C, Luo B, Xie X, Liao X, Fu J, Ge Y Curr Med Sci. 2018; 38(1):19-25.

PMID: 30074147 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-018-1842-0.

References
1.
Kalantry S, Mills K, Yee D, Otte A, Panning B, Magnuson T . The Polycomb group protein Eed protects the inactive X-chromosome from differentiation-induced reactivation. Nat Cell Biol. 2006; 8(2):195-202. PMC: 1400591. DOI: 10.1038/ncb1351. View

2.
Shipony Z, Mukamel Z, Mendelson Cohen N, Landan G, Chomsky E, Zeliger S . Dynamic and static maintenance of epigenetic memory in pluripotent and somatic cells. Nature. 2014; 513(7516):115-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature13458. View

3.
Navarro P, Chambers I, Karwacki-Neisius V, Chureau C, Morey C, Rougeulle C . Molecular coupling of Xist regulation and pluripotency. Science. 2008; 321(5896):1693-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1160952. View

4.
Okamoto I, Otte A, Allis C, Reinberg D, Heard E . Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science. 2003; 303(5658):644-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1092727. View

5.
Kay G, Barton S, Surani M, Rastan S . Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development. Cell. 1994; 77(5):639-50. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90049-3. View