» Articles » PMID: 26628536

Evaluation of Facial Volume Changes After Rejuvenation Surgery Using a 3-Dimensional Camera

Overview
Journal Aesthet Surg J
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2015 Dec 3
PMID 26628536
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Surgical rejuvenation alters facial volume distribution to achieve more youthful aesthetic contours. These changes are routinely compared subjectively. The introduction of 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry provides a novel method for measuring and comparing surgical results.

Objectives: We sought to quantify how specific facial areas are changed after rejuvenation surgery using the 3D camera.

Methods: Patients undergoing facial rejuvenation were imaged preoperatively and postoperatively with 3D stereophotogrammetry. Images were registered using facial surface landmarks unaltered by surgery. Colorimetric 3D analysis depicting postoperative volume changes was performed utilizing the 3D imaging software and quantitative volume measurements were constructed.

Results: Nine patients who underwent combined facelift procedures and fat grafting were evaluated. Median time for postoperative imaging was 4.8 months. Positive changes in facial volume occurred in the forehead, temples, and cheeks (median changes, 0.9 mL ± 4.3 SD; 0.8 mL ± 0.47 SD; and 1.4 mL ± 1.6 SD, respectively). Negative changes in volume occurred in the nasolabial folds, marionette basins, and neck/submental regions (median changes, -1.0 mL ± 0.37 SD; -0.4 mL ± 0.9 SD; and -2.0 mL ± 4.3 SD, respectively).

Conclusions: The technique of 3D stereophotogrammetry provides a tool for quantifying facial volume distribution after rejuvenation procedures. Areas of consistent volume increase include the forehead, temples, and cheeks; areas of negative volume change occur in the nasolabial folds, marionette basins, and submental/chin regions. This technology may be utilized to better understand the dynamic changes that occur with facial rejuvenation and quantify longevity of various rejuvenation techniques.

Level Of Evidence: 4 Diagnostic.

Citing Articles

Autologous fat grafting for cosmetic temporal augmentation: a systematic review.

Nasim S, Nasim H, Kauke M, Safi A Front Surg. 2024; 11:1410162.

PMID: 39371685 PMC: 11449973. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1410162.


Comparative 3D Analysis of Lip Rejuvenation: Investigating Effects Before and After Soft-Tissue Filler Compared with Controls.

Cardoso J, do Valle C, Neppelenbroek K, Oliveira Valarelli T, Sforza C, Soares S Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; 49(3):875-884.

PMID: 39313661 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04410-6.


Slim the face or not: 3D change of facial soft and hard tissues after third molars extraction: a pilot study.

Wang X, Yang H, Wang E, Cui X, Zhao Y, Jiang J BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):508.

PMID: 37479973 PMC: 10362706. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03214-5.


Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method.

Cho R, Byun S, Yi S, Ahn H, Nam Y, Park I Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(5).

PMID: 37237615 PMC: 10215089. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10050545.


Three-dimensional Quantitative Standards for Assessing Outcomes of Facial Lipotransfer: A Review.

Wang W, Yao C, Wang H, Guo W Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 47(4):1568-1577.

PMID: 36800009 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03266-6.