» Articles » PMID: 26628534

Transferring Patients Home to Die: What is the Potential Population in UK Critical Care Units?

Overview
Date 2015 Dec 3
PMID 26628534
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Most people when asked, express a preference to die at home, but little is known about whether this is an option for critically ill patients. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to describe the size and characteristics of the critical care population who could potentially be transferred home to die if they expressed such a wish.

Methods: Medical notes of all patients who died in, or within 5 days of discharge from seven critical care units across two hospital sites over a 12-month period were reviewed. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were developed and applied to identify the number of patients who had potential to be transferred home to die and demographic and clinical data (eg, conscious state, respiratory and cardiac support therapies) collected.

Results: 7844 patients were admitted over a 12-month period. 422 (5.4%) patients died. Using the criteria developed 100 (23.7%) patients could have potentially been transferred home to die. Of these 41 (41%) patients were diagnosed with respiratory disease. 53 (53%) patients were conscious, 47 (47%) patients were self-ventilating breathing room air/oxygen via a mask. 20 (20%) patients were ventilated via an endotracheal tube. 76 (76%) patients were not requiring inotropes/vasopressors. Mean time between discussion about treatment withdrawal and time of death was 36.4 h (SD=46.48). No patients in this cohort were transferred home.

Conclusions: A little over 20% of patients dying in critical care demonstrate potential to be transferred home to die. Staff should actively consider the practice of transferring home as an option for care at end of life for these patients.

Citing Articles

End of life care at home: The role of critical care transfer services.

Sudunagunta V, Singh N, Khan P, Beaumont P J Intensive Care Soc. 2024; 25(2):237-241.

PMID: 38737303 PMC: 11086710. DOI: 10.1177/17511437231217878.


Lessons learned and new directions regarding Discharge Direct from Adult Intensive Care Units Sent Home (DISH): A narrative review.

Basmaji J, Lau V, Lam J, Priestap F, Ball I J Intensive Care Soc. 2019; 20(2):165-170.

PMID: 31037110 PMC: 6475989. DOI: 10.1177/1751143718794123.

References
1.
Boussarsar M, Bouchoucha S . Dying at home: cultural and religious preferences. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32(11):1917-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0370-8. View

2.
Huang Y, Huang S, Ko W . Going home to die from surgical intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(5):810-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1452-1. View

3.
Coombs M, Long-Sutehall T, Darlington A, Richardson A . Doctors' and nurses' views and experience of transferring patients from critical care home to die: a qualitative exploratory study. Palliat Med. 2014; 29(4):354-62. PMC: 4370931. DOI: 10.1177/0269216314560208. View

4.
Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson I . Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013; 12:7. PMC: 3623898. DOI: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-7. View

5.
Kallel H, Dammak H, Bahloul M, Ben Hamida C, Chelly H, Rekik N . A good death: another break in the wall. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32(11):1915-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0369-1. View