» Articles » PMID: 26628526

A Cross-sectional Mixed Methods Study Protocol to Generate Learning from Patient Safety Incidents Reported from General Practice

Abstract

Introduction: Incident reports contain descriptions of errors and harms that occurred during clinical care delivery. Few observational studies have characterised incidents from general practice, and none of these have been from the England and Wales National Reporting and Learning System. This study aims to describe incidents reported from a general practice care setting.

Methods And Analysis: A general practice patient safety incident classification will be developed to characterise patient safety incidents. A weighted-random sample of 12,500 incidents describing no harm, low harm and moderate harm of patients, and all incidents describing severe harm and death of patients will be classified. Insights from exploratory descriptive statistics and thematic analysis will be combined to identify priority areas for future interventions.

Ethics And Dissemination: The need for ethical approval was waivered by the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board research risk review committee given the anonymised nature of data (ABHB R&D Ref number: SA/410/13). The authors will submit the results of the study to relevant journals and undertake national and international oral presentations to researchers, clinicians and policymakers.

Citing Articles

Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.

Acton J, McFadzean J, Lau C, Foo J, Carson-Stevens A Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39948402 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6.


Understanding the scale and nature of avoidable healthcare-associated harm for prisoners in England: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Carson-Stevens A, McFadzean I, Purchase T, Gwyn S, Hellard S, Davies K BMJ Open. 2025; 14(12):e085607.

PMID: 39806709 PMC: 11667317. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085607.


Multiple points of system failure underpin continuous subcutaneous infusion safety incidents in palliative care: A mixed methods analysis.

Brown A, Yardley S, Bowers B, Francis S, Bemand-Qureshi L, Hellard S Palliat Med. 2024; 39(1):7-21.

PMID: 39444150 PMC: 11673304. DOI: 10.1177/02692163241287639.


Analysis of applying a patient safety taxonomy to patient and clinician-reported incident reports during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods study.

Purchase T, Cooper A, Price D, Dorgeat E, Williams H, Bowie P BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):234.

PMID: 37838681 PMC: 10576389. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-02057-6.


Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.

Hibbert P, Ash R, Molloy C, Westbrook J, Cameron I, Carson-Stevens A Int J Qual Health Care. 2023; 35(4).

PMID: 37795694 PMC: 10654691. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad085.


References
1.
Vincent C . Analysis of clinical incidents: a window on the system not a search for root causes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13(4):242-3. PMC: 1743862. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.242. View

2.
Spittal M, Findlay G, Spencer I . A prospective analysis of critical incidents attributable to anaesthesia. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995; 7(4):363-71. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/7.4.363. View

3.
Makeham M, Dovey S, County M, Kidd M . An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002; 177(2):68-72. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04668.x. View

4.
Dovey S, Meyers D, Phillips Jr R, Green L, Fryer G, Galliher J . A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(3):233-8. PMC: 1743626. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.233. View

5.
Astion M, Shojania K, Hamill T, Kim S, Ng V . Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 120(1):18-26. DOI: 10.1309/8EXC-CM6Y-R1TH-UBAF. View