» Articles » PMID: 26623200

Comparing Radiation Dose from Conventional Fluoroscopy to Intraoperative Cone Beam CT (O-arm) During Percutaneous Lesioning Procedures of the Gasserian Ganglion

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2015 Dec 2
PMID 26623200
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The use of intraoperative CT-guidance during the percutaneous treatment of trigeminal neuralgia has become increasingly popular due to the greater ease of foramen ovale cannulation and decreased procedure times. Concerns regarding radiation dose to the patient, however, remain unaddressed. We sought to compare the emitted radiation dose from fluoroscopy with intraoperative CT for these procedures.

Methods: A retrospective review of percutaneous lesioning procedures for trigeminal neuralgia performed between 2010 until 2012 at our institution was conducted and radiation doses to the patient were recorded. We subsequently simulated four separate percutaneous trigeminal rhizotomies using the O-arm intraoperative CT (Medtronics, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to cannulate the foramen ovale bilaterally in two formalin-fixed cadaver heads.

Results: Seventeen successful percutaneous treatments for trigeminal neuralgia were performed during the study period. Eleven procedures containing complete records were included in the final analysis. For procedures using fluoroscopy, the mean dosage was 15.2 mGys (range: 1.15 - 47.95, 95% CI 7.34 - 22.99). Radiation dosage from the O-arm imaging system was 16.55 mGy for all four cases. An unequal variance t-test did not reach statistical significance (p=0.42).

Conclusions: We did not observe a significant difference in radiation dose delivered to subjects when comparing CT-guided foramen ovale cannulation relative to fluoroscopy for percutaneous lesioning of the Gasserian ganglion. Additional study is required under operational settings.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Balloon Compression for Trigeminal Neuralgia. A Comparative Study Between the Fluoroscope Guided and Neuronavigated Technique.

DErcole M, Tufo T, Izzo A, Rapisarda A, Polli F, Signorelli F Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023; 135:157-160.

PMID: 38153464 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_25.


Intraoperative cone-beam and slot-beam CT: 3D image quality and dose with a slot collimator on the O-arm imaging system.

Zhang X, Zbijewski W, Huang Y, Uneri A, Jones C, Lo S Med Phys. 2021; 48(11):6800-6809.

PMID: 34519364 PMC: 10174643. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15221.

References
1.
Katusic S, Williams D, Beard C, Bergstralh E, Kurland L . Epidemiology and clinical features of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: similarities and differences, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945-1984. Neuroepidemiology. 1991; 10(5-6):276-81. DOI: 10.1159/000110284. View

2.
Hakanson S . Trigeminal neuralgia treated by the injection of glycerol into the trigeminal cistern. Neurosurgery. 1981; 9(6):638-46. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198112000-00005. View

3.
Gusmao S, Oliveira M, Tazinaffo U, Honey C . Percutaneous trigeminal nerve radiofrequency rhizotomy guided by computerized tomography fluoroscopy. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2003; 99(4):785-6. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0785. View

4.
Lin M, Lee M, Wang T, Cheng Y, Su C, Chang C . Foramen ovale cannulation guided by intra-operative computed tomography with integrated neuronavigation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011; 153(8):1593-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-011-1009-2. View

5.
. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP. 2003; 31(4):5-31. View