» Articles » PMID: 26614621

System Hazards in Managing Laboratory Test Requests and Results in Primary Care: Medical Protection Database Analysis and Conceptual Model

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Nov 29
PMID 26614621
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To analyse a medical protection organisation's database to identify hazards related to general practice systems for ordering laboratory tests, managing test results and communicating test result outcomes to patients. To integrate these data with other published evidence sources to inform design of a systems-based conceptual model of related hazards.

Design: A retrospective database analysis.

Setting: General practices in the UK and Ireland.

Participants: 778 UK and Ireland general practices participating in a medical protection organisation's clinical risk self-assessment (CRSA) programme from January 2008 to December 2014.

Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of practices with system risks; categorisation of identified hazards; most frequently occurring hazards; development of a conceptual model of hazards; and potential impacts on health, well-being and organisational performance.

Results: CRSA visits were undertaken to 778 UK and Ireland general practices of which a range of systems hazards were recorded across the laboratory test ordering and results management systems in 647 practices (83.2%). A total of 45 discrete hazard categories were identified with a mean of 3.6 per practice (SD=1.94). The most frequently occurring hazard was the inadequate process for matching test requests and results received (n=350, 54.1%). Of the 1604 instances where hazards were recorded, the most frequent was at the 'postanalytical test stage' (n=702, 43.8%), followed closely by 'communication outcomes issues' (n=628, 39.1%).

Conclusions: Based on arguably the largest data set currently available on the subject matter, our study findings shed new light on the scale and nature of hazards related to test results handling systems, which can inform future efforts to research and improve the design and reliability of these systems.

Citing Articles

'I guess I'll wait to hear'- communication of blood test results in primary care a qualitative study.

Watson J, Salisbury C, Whiting P, Hamilton W, Banks J Br J Gen Pract. 2022; .

PMID: 35817586 PMC: 9282801. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0069.


Why Test study protocol: a UK-wide audit using the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive (PACT) to explore the reasons for primary care testing.

Burrell A, Duncan P, Bennett-Britton I, Hodgson S, Merriel S, Waqar S BJGP Open. 2022; 6(3).

PMID: 35508322 PMC: 9680757. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0017.


Error evaluation in the laboratory testing process and laboratory information systems.

Arifin A, Mohd-Yusof M J Med Biochem. 2022; 41(1):21-31.

PMID: 35291500 PMC: 8882017. DOI: 10.5937/jomb0-31382.


Content analysis of 50 clinical negligence claims involving test results management systems in general practice.

Baylis D, Price J, Bowie P BMJ Open Qual. 2018; 7(4):e000463.

PMID: 30555934 PMC: 6267325. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000463.

References
1.
Bowie P, Forrest E, Price J, Verstappen W, Cunningham D, Halley L . Good practice statements on safe laboratory testing: A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015; 21 Suppl:19-25. PMC: 4828633. DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043724. View

2.
Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh B, Gurses A, Alvarado C, Smith M . Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15 Suppl 1:i50-8. PMC: 2464868. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015842. View

3.
Hickner J, Fernald D, Harris D, Poon E, Elder N, Mold J . Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005; 31(2):81-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31012-9. View

4.
Cunningham D, McNab D, Bowie P . Quality and safety issues highlighted by patients in the handling of laboratory test results by general practices--a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:206. PMC: 4048051. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-206. View

5.
Jacobs S, OBeirne M, Derfiingher L, Vlach L, Rosser W, Drummond N . Errors and adverse events in family medicine: developing and validating a Canadian taxonomy of errors. Can Fam Physician. 2007; 53(2):271-6, 270. PMC: 1949126. View