Trait-related Decision Making Impairment in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: Evidence from Decision Making Under Ambiguity but Not Decision Making Under Risk
Authors
Affiliations
This study aimed to investigate whether deficits in decision making were potential endophenotype markers for OCD considering different phases of the disease. Fifty-seven non-medicated OCD patients (nmOCD), 77 medicated OCD patients (mOCD), 48 remitted patients with OCD (rOCD) and 115 healthy controls were assessed with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which measured decision making under ambiguity, and the Game of Dice Task (GDT), which measured decision making under risk. While the three patients groups showed impaired performance on the IGT compared with healthy controls, all patients showed intact performance on the GDT. Furthermore, the rOCD patients showed a preference for deck B, indicating that they showed more sensitivity to the frequency of loss than to the magnitude of loss, whereas the mOCD patients showed a preference for deck A, indicating that they had more sensitivity to the magnitude of loss than to the frequency of loss. These data suggested that OCD patients had trait-related impairments in decision making under ambiguity but not under risk, and that dissociation of decision making under ambiguity and under risk is an appropriate potential neurocognitive endophenotype for OCD. The subtle but meaningful differences in decision making performance between the OCD groups require further study.
Murayama K, Tomiyama H, Ohno A, Kato K, Matsuo A, Hasuzawa S Front Psychiatry. 2023; 14:1227057.
PMID: 37840793 PMC: 10570432. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227057.
Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
Strasser C, Michajlova L Front Artif Intell. 2023; 6:1133998.
PMID: 37275534 PMC: 10235603. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1133998.
Behavioral domains in compulsive rats: implications for understanding compulsive spectrum disorders.
Martin-Gonzalez E, Olmedo-Cordoba M, Prados-Pardo A, Cruz-Garzon D, Flores P, Mora S Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1175137.
PMID: 37273281 PMC: 10234153. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1175137.
Exploring decision-making strategies in the Iowa gambling task and rat gambling task.
Hultman C, Tjernstrom N, Vadlin S, Rehn M, Nilsson K, Roman E Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:964348.
PMID: 36408452 PMC: 9669572. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.964348.
Hasuzawa S, Tomiyama H, Murayama K, Ohno A, Kang M, Mizobe T Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:836965.
PMID: 35633792 PMC: 9136000. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.836965.