» Articles » PMID: 26596914

Normal Brain Sparing With Increasing Number of Beams and Isocenters in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Beam Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases

Overview
Date 2015 Nov 25
PMID 26596914
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent studies have reported about the application of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. One of the key concerns for these radiosurgical treatments lies in the integral dose within the normal brain tissue, as it has been shown to increase with increasing number of brain tumors treated. In this study, we investigate the potential to improve normal brain tissue sparing specific to volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy by increasing the number of isocenters and arc beams. Adopting a multi-institutional benchmark study protocol of planning multiple brain metastases via a radiosurgical apparatus, a flattening filter-free TrueBeam RapidArc delivery system (Varian Oncology, Palo Alto, California) was used for a volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy treatment planning study, where treatment plans for target combinations of N = 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 targets were developed with increasing numbers of isocenters and arc beams. The treatment plans for each target combination were compared dosimetrically among each other and against the reference Gamma Knife treatment plan from the original benchmark study. We observed that as the number of isocenters or arc beams increased, the normal brain isodose volumes such as 12- to 4-Gy on average decreased by up to 15% for all the studied cases. However, when the best volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy normal brain isodose volumes were compared against the corresponding reference Gamma Knife values, volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy remained 100% to 200% higher than those of Gamma Knife for all target combinations. The study results, particularly for the solitary (N = 1) metastases case, directly challenged the general notion of dose equivalence among current radiosurgical modalities. In conclusion, multiple isocenter and multiple arc beam delivery solutions are capable of decreasing normal brain irradiation exposure for volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy. However, there is further technological development in need for volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy before similar dosimetric treatment plans could be achievable when compared to Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

Citing Articles

Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review.

Mukwada G, Chamunyonga C, Rowshanfarzad P, Gill S, Ebert M PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0307088.

PMID: 39121064 PMC: 11315342. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307088.


Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series.

Asso R, Mancini A, Palhares D, Junior W, Marta G, da Silva J Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(4):593-601.

PMID: 36196425 PMC: 9521688. DOI: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0058.


Quality of Automated Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plans in Patients with 4 to 10 Brain Metastases.

Petoukhova A, Snijder R, Wiggenraad R, de Boer-de Wit L, Mudde-van der Wouden I, Florijn M Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(14).

PMID: 34298671 PMC: 8307043. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143458.


Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.

Zhang S, Yang R, Wang X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(11):104-110.

PMID: 31580532 PMC: 6839388. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12746.


Frameless Image-Guided Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastasis Using VMAT: A Review and an Institutional Experience.

Hanna S, Mancini A, Dal Col A, Asso R, Neves-Junior W Front Oncol. 2019; 9:703.

PMID: 31440464 PMC: 6693418. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00703.