» Articles » PMID: 26592420

Electrochemical Biofilm Control: a Review

Overview
Journal Biofouling
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Nov 24
PMID 26592420
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the methods of controlling biofilms that has widely been discussed in the literature is to apply a potential or electrical current to a metal surface on which the biofilm is growing. Although electrochemical biofilm control has been studied for decades, the literature is often conflicting, as is detailed in this review. The goals of this review are: (1) to present the current status of knowledge regarding electrochemical biofilm control; (2) to establish a basis for a fundamental definition of electrochemical biofilm control and requirements for studying it; (3) to discuss current proposed mechanisms; and (4) to introduce future directions in the field. It is expected that the review will provide researchers with guidelines on comparing datasets across the literature and generating comparable datasets. The authors believe that, with the correct design, electrochemical biofilm control has great potential for industrial use.

Citing Articles

Electric Current Application on Dental Implant Biofilms: Review.

Rodrigues F, Rodrigues da Silva M, Silva F, Madeira S, Carvalho O J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057318 PMC: 11278489. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15070197.


Revealing detrimental effects of various DC electrical energy conditions on different multidrug resistant bacteria: a comprehensive study.

Shawki M, El-Shall H, Moustafa M, Atay K, Elsheredy A, Eltarahony M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17046.

PMID: 39048587 PMC: 11269707. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66063-4.


Antifungal Activity, Synergism with Fluconazole or Amphotericin B and Potential Mechanism of Direct Current against Biofilms and Persisters.

Zou P, Liu J, Li P, Luan Q Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38927187 PMC: 11200915. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13060521.


Zirconia Dental Implants Surface Electric Stimulation Impact on .

Rodrigues F, Pereira H, Pinto J, Padrao J, Zille A, Silva F Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(11).

PMID: 38891904 PMC: 11171956. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25115719.


Biofilm inhibition/eradication: exploring strategies and confronting challenges in combatting biofilm.

Srivastava A, Verma N, Kumar V, Apoorva P, Agarwal V Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(5):212.

PMID: 38616221 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-03938-0.


References
1.
Burke V, Gibson F . The Gram Reaction and the Electric Charge of Bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1933; 26(2):211-4. PMC: 533554. DOI: 10.1128/jb.26.2.211-214.1933. View

2.
Liu W, Brown M, Elliott T . Mechanisms of the bactericidal activity of low amperage electric current (DC). J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997; 39(6):687-95. DOI: 10.1093/jac/39.6.687. View

3.
Wellman N, Fortun S, McLeod B . Bacterial biofilms and the bioelectric effect. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40(9):2012-4. PMC: 163464. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.9.2012. View

4.
Busalmen J, de Sanchez S . Electrochemical polarization-induced changes in the growth of individual cells and biofilms of Pseudomonas fluorescens (ATCC 17552). Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(10):6235-40. PMC: 1265957. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6235-6240.2005. View

5.
Niepa T, Gilbert J, Ren D . Controlling Pseudomonas aeruginosa persister cells by weak electrochemical currents and synergistic effects with tobramycin. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(30):7356-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.092. View