» Articles » PMID: 26589786

Gains Attained in Malaria Control Coverage Within Settings Earmarked for Pre-elimination: Malaria Indicator and Prevalence Surveys 2012, Eritrea

Overview
Journal Malar J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Tropical Medicine
Date 2015 Nov 22
PMID 26589786
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Eritrea, like most countries in sub-Saharan Africa, has expended much effort towards malaria control with the view of transitioning from reduction of the disease burden to elimination. This paper reports on the level of achievement as highlighted by the follow-on, malaria-endemic area representative, survey that aimed to provide data and to assess progress on malaria indicators and parasite prevalence at household level across the country.

Methods: In 2012, data were collected using a two-stage stratified cluster random sample of 1887 households in 96 clusters (villages in rural areas and census enumeration areas in urban centers) during a malaria indicator and prevalence survey in Eritrea. The survey determined parasite prevalence in vulnerable population groups and evaluated coverage, use and access to malaria control services. Standardized Roll-Back Malaria Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group household and women's questionnaires were adapted to the local situation and used for collection of data that were analysed and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results: The results of the survey showed that 90% (95% CI 89-91) of households owned at least one mosquito net. The proportion of the population with access to an insecticide-treated net (ITN) in their household was 55% (95% CI 54-56). The utilization of ITNs was 67% (95% CI 65-70) for children under 5 years and 60% (95% CI 58-63) for pregnant women (OR: 0. 73(95% CI 0.62-0.85); P = 0.52). Only 28% (95% CI 26-30) of households were covered by indoor residual spraying (IRS) the previous year with significant heterogeneity by zoba (Debub 50 % (95% CI 45-54) vs Gash Barka 32 % (95% CI 28-36); OR = 0. 47 (95% CI 0.36-0.61), P = 0.05). Malaria parasite prevalence was low; 1.1% (95% CI 0.9-1.3) in the general population and 1.4% (95% CI 1.0-2.0) in children under five and 0.7% (95% CI 0.4-1.1) among women aged 15-49 years. Only 19% (95% CI 15-26) of children under five had fever in the 2 weeks preceding the survey, with 61% (95% CI 54.1-67.1) seeking treatment from a health facility. Data on knowledge levels show that 92% reported that malaria is transmitted by mosquitoes, 92% mentioned that the use of mosquito nets could prevent malaria, 47% knew malaria prevention medication, 83% cited fever as a sign and symptom of malaria, and 35% had heard or seen malaria awareness messages.

Conclusion: Notwithstanding confounders, the observed low malaria parasite prevalence could be associated with malaria intervention coverage, access and utilization as well as high and equitable knowledge levels in the population. This indicates that Eritrea is on the right track towards pre-elimination. However, technical and infrastructure capacity should be strengthened to facilitate implementation, surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation.

Citing Articles

The spread of molecular markers of artemisinin partial resistance and diagnostic evasion in Eritrea: a retrospective molecular epidemiology study.

Mihreteab S, Anderson K, Fuente I, Sutherland C, Smith D, Cunningham J Lancet Microbe. 2024; 6(2):100930.

PMID: 39653047 PMC: 11798904. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00172-1.


Screening for antifolate and artemisinin resistance in  dried-blood spots from three hospitals of Eritrea.

Mukhongo H, Kinyua J, Weldemichael Y, Kasili R F1000Res. 2024; 10:628.

PMID: 38840941 PMC: 11150900. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.54195.3.


Understanding psychosocial determinants of malaria behaviours in low-transmission settings: a scoping review.

Casella A, Monroe A, Toso M, Hunter G, Underwood C, Pillai R Malar J. 2024; 23(1):15.

PMID: 38200574 PMC: 10782749. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04831-9.


Community knowledge and practice of malaria prevention in Ghindae, Eritrea, a Cross-sectional study.

Andegiorgish A, Goitom S, Mesfun K, Hagos M, Tesfaldet M, Habte E Afr Health Sci. 2023; 23(1):241-254.

PMID: 37545951 PMC: 10398460. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.26.


Malaria awareness of adults in high, moderate and low transmission settings: A cross-sectional study in rural East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia.

Guntur R, Kingsley J, Islam F PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259950.

PMID: 34780554 PMC: 8592438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259950.


References
1.
Sharp B, Ridl F, Govender D, Kuklinski J, Kleinschmidt I . Malaria vector control by indoor residual insecticide spraying on the tropical island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea. Malar J. 2007; 6:52. PMC: 1868751. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-52. View

2.
Guerra C, Snow R, Hay S . Mapping the global extent of malaria in 2005. Trends Parasitol. 2006; 22(8):353-8. PMC: 3111076. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.06.006. View

3.
Nyarango P, Gebremeskel T, Mebrahtu G, Mufunda J, Abdulmumini U, Ogbamariam A . A steep decline of malaria morbidity and mortality trends in Eritrea between 2000 and 2004: the effect of combination of control methods. Malar J. 2006; 5:33. PMC: 1501031. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-33. View

4.
Lengeler C . Insecticide-treated nets for malaria control: real gains. Bull World Health Organ. 2004; 82(2):84. PMC: 2585896. View

5.
Chanda E, Ameneshewa B, Angula H, Iitula I, Uusiku P, Trune D . Strengthening tactical planning and operational frameworks for vector control: the roadmap for malaria elimination in Namibia. Malar J. 2015; 14:302. PMC: 4524019. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0785-1. View