» Articles » PMID: 26576425

Systematic Review of the Use of Phytochemicals for Management of Pain in Cancer Therapy

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Nov 18
PMID 26576425
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pain in cancer therapy is a common condition and there is a need for new options in therapeutic management. While phytochemicals have been proposed as one pain management solution, knowledge of their utility is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the biomedical literature for the use of phytochemicals for management of cancer therapy pain in human subjects. Of an initial database search of 1,603 abstracts, 32 full-text articles were eligible for further assessment. Only 7 of these articles met all inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The average relative risk of phytochemical versus control was 1.03 [95% CI 0.59 to 2.06]. In other words (although not statistically significant), patients treated with phytochemicals were slightly more likely than patients treated with control to obtain successful management of pain in cancer therapy. We identified a lack of quality research literature on this subject and thus were unable to demonstrate a clear therapeutic benefit for either general or specific use of phytochemicals in the management of cancer pain. This lack of data is especially apparent for psychotropic phytochemicals, such as the Cannabis plant (marijuana). Additional implications of our findings are also explored.

Citing Articles

Optimization of an Protocol Using Probe Permeabilities to Identify Membrane Pan-Assay Interference Compounds.

Magalhaes P, Reis P, Vila-Vicosa D, Machuqueiro M, Victor B J Chem Inf Model. 2022; 62(12):3034-3042.

PMID: 35697029 PMC: 9770580. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00372.


Necessary but not sufficient: unique author identifiers.

Harrison A, Harrison A BMJ Innov. 2017; 2(4):141-143.

PMID: 28616253 PMC: 5451540. DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000135.


Tasty THC: Promises and Challenges of Cannabis Edibles.

Barrus D, Capogrossi K, Cates S, Gourdet C, Peiper N, Novak S Methods Rep RTI Press. 2017; 2016.

PMID: 28127591 PMC: 5260817. DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2016.op.0035.1611.

References
1.
Siveen K, Sikka S, Surana R, Dai X, Zhang J, Kumar A . Targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway in cancer: role of synthetic and natural inhibitors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1845(2):136-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2013.12.005. View

2.
Brooker S, Martin S, Pearson A, Bagchi D, Earl J, Gothard L . Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase II trial of IH636 grape seed proanthocyanidin extract (GSPE) in patients with radiation-induced breast induration. Radiother Oncol. 2006; 79(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.02.008. View

3.
Park Y, Won J, Kim Y, Choi J, Park H, Lee K . In vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects of the methanol extract of Inonotus obliquus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005; 101(1-3):120-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.04.003. View

4.
Korangath P, Teo W, Sadik H, Han L, Mori N, Huijts C . Targeting Glutamine Metabolism in Breast Cancer with Aminooxyacetate. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(14):3263-73. PMC: 4696069. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1200. View

5.
Kim Y, Park H, Kim J, Lee J, Moon S, Shin C . Anti-cancer effect and structural characterization of endo-polysaccharide from cultivated mycelia of Inonotus obliquus. Life Sci. 2006; 79(1):72-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.12.047. View