» Articles » PMID: 26575114

Patient-Reported Barriers to High-Quality, End-of-Life Care: A Multiethnic, Multilingual, Mixed-Methods Study

Overview
Journal J Palliat Med
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2015 Nov 18
PMID 26575114
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The study objective was to empirically identify barriers reported by multiethnic patients and families in receiving high-quality end-of-life care (EOLC).

Methods: This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study in Burmese, English, Hindi, Mandarin, Tagalog, Spanish, and Vietnamese was held in multiethnic community centers in five California cities. Data were collected in 2013-2014. A snowball sampling technique was used to accrue 387 participants-261 women, 126 men, 133 Caucasian, 204 Asian Americans, 44 African Americans, and 6 Hispanic Americans. Measured were multiethnic patient-reported barriers to high-quality EOLC. A development cohort (72 participants) of responses was analyzed qualitatively using grounded theory to identify the six key barriers to high-quality EOLC. A new validation cohort (315 participants) of responses was transcribed, translated, and back-translated for verification. The codes were validated by analyses of responses from 50 randomly drawn subjects from the validation cohort. All the 315 validation cohort transcripts were coded for presence or absence of the six barriers.

Results: In the validation cohort, 60.6% reported barriers to receiving high-quality EOLC for persons in their culture/ethnicity. Primary patient-reported barriers were (1) finance/health insurance barriers, (2) doctor behaviors, (3) communication chasm between doctors and patients, (4) family beliefs/behaviors, (5) health system barriers, and (6) cultural/religious barriers. Age (χ(2) = 9.15, DF = 1, p = 0.003); gender (χ(2) = 6.605, DF = 1, p = 0.01); and marital status (χ(2) = 16.11 DF = 3, p = 0.001) were associated with reporting barriers; and women <80 years were most likely to report barriers to receiving high-quality EOLC. Individual responses of reported barriers were analyzed and only the participant's level of education (Friedman statistic = 2.16, DF = 10, p = 0.02) significantly influenced choices.

Conclusion: Multiethnic patients report that high-quality EOLC is important to them; but unfortunately, a majority state that they have encountered barriers to receiving such care. Efforts must be made to rapidly improve access to culturally competent EOLC for diverse populations.

Citing Articles

Lived experiences of palliative care physicians on the impacts of language and cultural discordance on end-of-life care across Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study using the intersectionality-based policy framework.

Lee S, Gibb M, Karunananthan S, Cody M, Tanuseputro P, Kendall C Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):229.

PMID: 39511592 PMC: 11546380. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02312-2.


Disparities in end-of-life care for minoritized racial and ethnic patients during terminal hospitalizations in New York State.

Cid M, Quan Vega M, Yang Z, Guglielminotti J, Li G, Hua M J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024; 72(9):2690-2699.

PMID: 38982870 PMC: 11368611. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19046.


Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles.

Izumi S, Garcia E, Kualaau A, Sloan D, DeSanto-Madeya S, Candrian C PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0301426.

PMID: 38557983 PMC: 10984538. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301426.


Can Artificial Intelligence aid communication? Considering the possibilities of GPT-3 in Palliative care.

Srivastava R, Srivastava S Indian J Palliat Care. 2023; 29(4):418-425.

PMID: 38058478 PMC: 10696352. DOI: 10.25259/IJPC_155_2023.


Healthcare practitioners' perspectives of providing palliative care to patients from culturally diverse backgrounds: a qualitative systematic review.

Burke C, Doody O, Lloyd B BMC Palliat Care. 2023; 22(1):182.

PMID: 37978500 PMC: 10655398. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01285-3.


References
1.
Himmelstein D, Thorne D, Warren E, Woolhandler S . Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. Am J Med. 2009; 122(8):741-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.012. View

2.
Stacey D, Bennett C, Barry M, Col N, Eden K, Holmes-Rovner M . Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (10):CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. View

3.
Zhang B, Wright A, Huskamp H, Nilsson M, Maciejewski M, Earle C . Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(5):480-8. PMC: 2862687. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.587. View

4.
Hopp F, Duffy S . Racial variations in end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48(6):658-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04724.x. View

5.
. Dying in America: improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Mil Med. 2015; 180(4):365-7. DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00005. View