» Articles » PMID: 26566206

Orbit-associated Tumors: Navigation and Control of Resection Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal J Neurosurg
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2015 Nov 14
PMID 26566206
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

OBJECT Treatment of skull base lesions is complex and usually requires a multidisciplinary approach. In meningioma, which is the most common tumor entity in this region, resection is considered to be the most important therapeutic step to avoid tumor recurrence. However, resection of skull base lesions with orbital or optic nerve involvement poses a challenge due to their anatomical structure and their proximity to eloquent areas. Therefore the main goal of surgery should be to achieve the maximum extent of resection while preserving neurological function. In the postoperative course, medical and radiotherapeutic strategies may then be successfully used to treat possible tumor residues. Methods to safely improve the extent of resection in skull base lesions therefore are desirable. The current study reports the authors' experience with the use of intraoperative CT (iCT) combined with neuronavigation with regard to feasibility and possible benefits of the method. METHODS Those patients with tumorous lesions in relationship to the orbit, sphenoid wing, or cavernous sinus who were surgically treated between October 2008 and December 2013 using iCT-based neuronavigation and in whom an intraoperative scan was obtained for control of resection were included. In all cases a second iCT scan was performed under sterile conditions after completion of navigation-guided microsurgical tumor resection. The surgical strategy was adapted accordingly; if necessary, resection was continued. RESULTS Twenty-three patients (19 with WHO Grade I meningioma and 4 with other lesions) were included. The most common clinical symptoms were loss of visual acuity and exophthalmus. Intraoperative control of resection by iCT was successfully obtained in all cases. Intraoperative imaging changed the surgical approach in more than half (52.2%) of these patients, either because iCT demonstrated unexpected residual tumor masses or because the second scan revealed additional tumor tissue that was not detected in the first scan due to overlay by osseous tumor parts; in these cases resection was continued. In the remaining cases resection was concluded as planned because iCT verified the surgeon's microscopic estimation of tumor resection status. Postoperative visual outcome was favorable in more than 80% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative CT allows control of resection in case of uncertainty and can help to improve the extent of maximal safe resection, especially in case of osseous tumor parts and masses within the orbit.

Citing Articles

Image-guided orbital surgery: a preclinical validation study using a high-resolution physical model.

Khan R, McElhinney K, Dickson A, Kileen R, Murphy C, OBrien D BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024; 9(1).

PMID: 38575345 PMC: 11002346. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001568.


Microscope-Based Augmented Reality with Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation for Resection of Skull Base Meningiomas in Consecutive Series of 39 Patients.

Pojskic M, Bopp M, SaB B, Carl B, Nimsky C Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 35565431 PMC: 9101634. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092302.


The Simpson Grading: Is It Still Valid?.

Chotai S, Schwartz T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35454912 PMC: 9031418. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082007.


Multimodal therapy of cavernous sinus meningioma: Impact of surgery and Ga-DOTATATE PET-guided radiation therapy on tumor control and functional outcome.

Hadi I, Biczok A, Terpolilli N, Thorsteinsdottir J, Forbrig R, Albert N Neurooncol Adv. 2021; 3(1):vdab114.

PMID: 34704034 PMC: 8541706. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab114.


CT-MRI Image Fusion-Based Computer-Assisted Navigation Management of Communicative Tumors Involved the Infratemporal-Middle Cranial Fossa.

Yang R, Lu H, Wang Y, Peng X, Mao C, Yi Z J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021; 82(Suppl 3):e321-e329.

PMID: 34306956 PMC: 8289544. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701603.