» Articles » PMID: 26564190

Advanced Low Carbon-to-nitrogen Ratio Wastewater Treatment by Electrochemical and Biological Coupling Process

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Nov 14
PMID 26564190
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nitrogen pollution in ground and surface water significantly affects the environment and its organisms, thereby leading to an increasingly serious environmental problem. Such pollution is difficult to degrade because of the lack of carbon sources. Therefore, an electrochemical and biological coupling process (EBCP) was developed with a composite catalytic biological carrier (CCBC) and applied in a pilot-scale cylindrical reactor to treat wastewater with a carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio of 2. The startup process, coupling principle, and dynamic feature of the EBCP were examined along with the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT), dissolved oxygen (DO), and initial pH on nitrogen removal. A stable coupling system was obtained after 51 days when plenty of biofilms were cultivated on the CCBC without inoculation sludge. Autotrophic denitrification, with [Fe(2+)] and [H] produced by iron-carbon galvanic cells in CCBC as electron donors, was confirmed by equity calculation of CODCr and nitrogen removal. Nitrogen removal efficiency was significantly influenced by HRT, DO, and initial pH with optimal values of 3.5 h, 3.5 ± 0.1 mg L(-1), and 7.5 ± 0.1, respectively. The ammonia, nitrate, and total nitrogen (TN) removal efficiencies of 90.1 to 95.3 %, 90.5 to 99.0 %, and 90.3 to 96.5 % were maintained with corresponding initial concentrations of 40 ± 2 mg L(-1) (NH3-N load of 0.27 ± 0.01 kg NH3-N m(-3) d(-1)), 20 ± 1 mg L(-1), and 60 ± 2 mg L(-1) (TN load of 0.41 ± 0.02 kg TN m(-3) d(-1)). Based on the Eckenfelder model, the kinetics equation of the nitrogen transformation along the reactor was N e  = N 0 exp (-0.04368 h/L(1.8438)). Hence, EBCP is a viable method for advanced low C/N ratio wastewater treatment.

Citing Articles

Biological nitrogen removal from low carbon wastewater.

Kosgey K, Zungu P, Bux F, Kumari S Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:968812.

PMID: 36466689 PMC: 9709150. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.968812.


Substances released during the decomposition of and .

Li Z, Liu P, Sun Z, Ma N, Lian J Heliyon. 2022; 8(11):e11441.

PMID: 36406669 PMC: 9667252. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11441.


Combination with catalyzed Fe(0)-carbon microelectrolysis and activated carbon adsorption for advanced reclaimed water treatment: simultaneous nitrate and biorefractory organics removal.

Hu Z, Li D, Deng S, Liu Y, Ma C, Zhang C Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26(6):5693-5703.

PMID: 30612352 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3919-5.

References
1.
Ma Y, Peng Y, Yuan Z, Wang S, Wu X . Feasibility of controlling nitrification in predenitrification plants using DO, pH and ORP sensors. Water Sci Technol. 2006; 53(4-5):235-43. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.128. View

2.
Choe S, Chang Y, Hwang K, Khim J . Kinetics of reductive denitrification by nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chemosphere. 2000; 41(8):1307-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(99)00506-8. View

3.
Miettinen I, Vartiainen T, Martikainen P . Contamination of drinking water. Nature. 1996; 381(6584):654-5. DOI: 10.1038/381654b0. View

4.
Sri Shalini S, Joseph K . Start-up of the SHARON and ANAMMOX process in landfill bioreactors using aerobic and anaerobic ammonium oxidising biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2013; 149:474-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.104. View

5.
Chen D, Wang H, Song M, Yang K, Liu C . [Study on hydrogen autotrophic denitrification of bio-ceramic reactor]. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2013; 34(10):3986-91. View