» Articles » PMID: 26561581

Extremely High Genetic Diversity in a Single Tumor Points to Prevalence of Non-Darwinian Cell Evolution

Abstract

The prevailing view that the evolution of cells in a tumor is driven by Darwinian selection has never been rigorously tested. Because selection greatly affects the level of intratumor genetic diversity, it is important to assess whether intratumor evolution follows the Darwinian or the non-Darwinian mode of evolution. To provide the statistical power, many regions in a single tumor need to be sampled and analyzed much more extensively than has been attempted in previous intratumor studies. Here, from a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor, we evaluated multiregional samples from the tumor, using either whole-exome sequencing (WES) (n = 23 samples) or genotyping (n = 286) under both the infinite-site and infinite-allele models of population genetics. In addition to the many single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) present in all samples, there were 35 "polymorphic" SNVs among samples. High genetic diversity was evident as the 23 WES samples defined 20 unique cell clones. With all 286 samples genotyped, clonal diversity agreed well with the non-Darwinian model with no evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Under the non-Darwinian model, MALL (the number of coding region mutations in the entire tumor) was estimated to be greater than 100 million in this tumor. DNA sequences reveal local diversities in small patches of cells and validate the estimation. In contrast, the genetic diversity under a Darwinian model would generally be orders of magnitude smaller. Because the level of genetic diversity will have implications on therapeutic resistance, non-Darwinian evolution should be heeded in cancer treatments even for microscopic tumors.

Citing Articles

State-of-the-Art Liver Cancer Organoids: Modeling Cancer Stem Cell Heterogeneity for Personalized Treatment.

Giron-Michel J, Padelli M, Oberlin E, Guenou H, Duclos-Vallee J BioDrugs. 2025; 39(2):237-260.

PMID: 39826071 PMC: 11906529. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00702-0.


The theory of massively repeated evolution and full identifications of cancer-driving nucleotides (CDNs).

Zhang L, Deng T, Liufu Z, Liu X, Chen B, Hu Z Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39688960 PMC: 11651657. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.99340.


Plasticity and Tumor Microenvironment in Pancreatic Cancer: Genetic, Metabolic, and Immune Perspectives.

Hashimoto A, Hashimoto S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39682280 PMC: 11640101. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16234094.


High-density sampling reveals volume growth in human tumours.

Angaji A, Owusu M, Velling C, Dick N, Weghorn D, Berg J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39587846 PMC: 11594531. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.95338.


Neutral evolution of rare cancer mutations in the computer and the clinic.

Beckman R NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):110.

PMID: 39358357 PMC: 11447017. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00436-3.


References
1.
Smith J, Haigh J . The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974; 23(1):23-35. View

2.
Garraway L, Lander E . Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell. 2013; 153(1):17-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002. View

3.
Merlo L, Pepper J, Reid B, Maley C . Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(12):924-35. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2013. View

4.
Zhang J, Fujimoto J, Zhang J, Wedge D, Song X, Zhang J . Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing. Science. 2014; 346(6206):256-9. PMC: 4354858. DOI: 10.1126/science.1256930. View

5.
Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View