» Articles » PMID: 26560737

Automatic Fall Detection System Based on the Combined Use of a Smartphone and a Smartwatch

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Nov 13
PMID 26560737
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to their widespread popularity, decreasing costs, built-in sensors, computing power and communication capabilities, Android-based personal devices are being seen as an appealing technology for the deployment of wearable fall detection systems. In contrast with previous solutions in the existing literature, which are based on the performance of a single element (a smartphone), this paper proposes and evaluates a fall detection system that benefits from the detection performed by two popular personal devices: a smartphone and a smartwatch (both provided with an embedded accelerometer and a gyroscope). In the proposed architecture, a specific application in each component permanently tracks and analyses the patient's movements. Diverse fall detection algorithms (commonly employed in the literature) were implemented in the developed Android apps to discriminate falls from the conventional activities of daily living of the patient. As a novelty, a fall is only assumed to have occurred if it is simultaneously and independently detected by the two Android devices (which can interact via Bluetooth communication). The system was systematically evaluated in an experimental testbed with actual test subjects simulating a set of falls and conventional movements associated with activities of daily living. The tests were repeated by varying the detection algorithm as well as the pre-defined mobility patterns executed by the subjects (i.e., the typology of the falls and non-fall movements). The proposed system was compared with the cases where only one device (the smartphone or the smartwatch) is considered to recognize and discriminate the falls. The obtained results show that the joint use of the two detection devices clearly increases the system's capability to avoid false alarms or 'false positives' (those conventional movements misidentified as falls) while maintaining the effectiveness of the detection decisions (that is to say, without increasing the ratio of 'false negatives' or actual falls that remain undetected).

Citing Articles

Analyzing Optimal Wearable Motion Sensor Placement for Accurate Classification of Fall Directions.

Teng S, Kim J, Jeon S, Gil H, Lyu J, Chung E Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409472 PMC: 11479374. DOI: 10.3390/s24196432.


The Value of Smartwatches in the Health Care Sector for Monitoring, Nudging, and Predicting: Viewpoint on 25 Years of Research.

Kohler C, Bartschke A, Furstenau D, Schaaf T, Salgado-Baez E J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e58936.

PMID: 39356287 PMC: 11549588. DOI: 10.2196/58936.


PIPTO: Precise Inertial-Based Pipeline for Threshold-Based Fall Detection Using Three-Axis Accelerometers.

Moutsis S, Tsintotas K, Gasteratos A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(18).

PMID: 37766008 PMC: 10534597. DOI: 10.3390/s23187951.


Using a Hybrid Neural Network and a Regularized Extreme Learning Machine for Human Activity Recognition with Smartphone and Smartwatch.

Tan T, Shih J, Liu S, Alkhaleefah M, Chang Y, Gochoo M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(6).

PMID: 36992065 PMC: 10059063. DOI: 10.3390/s23063354.


Smartphones and Threshold-Based Monitoring Methods Effectively Detect Falls Remotely: A Systematic Review.

Torres-Guzman R, Paulson M, Avila F, Maita K, Garcia J, Forte A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772364 PMC: 9920087. DOI: 10.3390/s23031323.


References
1.
Kangas M, Vikman I, Nyberg L, Korpelainen R, Lindblom J, Jamsa T . Comparison of real-life accidental falls in older people with experimental falls in middle-aged test subjects. Gait Posture. 2011; 35(3):500-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.016. View

2.
Zhang Z, Wang H, Vasilakos A, Fang H . ECG-cryptography and authentication in body area networks. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012; 16(6):1070-8. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2206115. View

3.
Acampora G, Cook D, Rashidi P, Vasilakos A . A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Health Care. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2014; 101(12):2470-2494. PMC: 3890262. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2013.2262913. View

4.
He D, Chen C, Chan S, Bu J, Vasilakos A . ReTrust: attack-resistant and lightweight trust management for medical sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012; 16(4):623-32. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2012.2194788. View

5.
Casilari E, Luque R, Moron M . Analysis of Android Device-Based Solutions for Fall Detection. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(8):17827-94. PMC: 4570297. DOI: 10.3390/s150817827. View