» Articles » PMID: 26556548

Middle Mesial Canals in Mandibular First Molars: A Micro-CT Study in Different Populations

Overview
Journal Arch Oral Biol
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2015 Nov 12
PMID 26556548
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the morphological aspects of middle mesial canals (MMC) in mandibular first molars using micro-CT.

Design: Mandibular first molars collected from the Brazilian (n=136) and Turkish (n=122) populations were scanned (voxel size: 9.9μm) and mesial roots with MMC (n=48) evaluated regarding several morphological aspects. The incidence of MMC in each population was statistically compared using Chi-square test (α=0.05).

Results: Overall, the incidence of MMC was 18.6% (48 out of 258 molars) and was significantly higher in the Brazilian (n=30; 22.1%) than in the Turkish (n=18; 14.8%) population (p<0.05). In both populations, confluent configuration of the MMC was the most frequent anatomy. Most of the specimens with MMC had 3 independent orifices (n=26; 54.2%) and 3 apical foramina (n=21; 43.8%). The mean minor diameter of the MMC orifice (0.16mm) was 3 times less than the other orifices (∼0.50mm). In mesial roots with independent configuration (n=3; 6.3%), the mean volumes (mm(3)) of the MMC, mesiobuccal (MBC) and mesiolingual (MLC) canals were 0.20±0.10, 0.75±0.28, and 0.88±0.19, respectively. In the specimens with canal confluence (n=26; 54.2%), MMC merged to the MBC (n=8; 16.7%), MLC (n=4; 8.3%), or to both MBC and MLC (n=14; 29.2%). Double mesial canal was observed in only 1 specimen. MMC with an independent foramen was observed mostly in Brazilian specimens.

Conclusions: Incidence of MMC was higher in the Brazilian molars. Confluent configuration was the most prevalent anatomic variation, while independent and fin configurations, as well as, double MMC, were found only in a few specimens.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and morphology of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars and their relationship with anatomical aspects of the mesial root: a CBCT analysis.

Wang D, Wang R, Xu H, Zhang Q, Guo Y BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):147.

PMID: 39875974 PMC: 11773784. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05533-1.


Retreatability of calcium silicate-based sealers based on micro-computed tomographic evaluation - A systematic review.

Bukhary S Saudi Dent J. 2024; 36(10):1278-1294.

PMID: 39525931 PMC: 11544169. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.09.011.


Middle mesial canal incidence and morphology in mandibular first molars: A cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography evaluation.

Singh H, Sroa R, Mann J J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024; 27(9):897-901.

PMID: 39450354 PMC: 11498231. DOI: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_319_24.


Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular molars: A cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography study.

Bascon-Mallado M, Cabrera-Fernandez A, Cabanillas-Balsera D, Crespo-Gallardo I, Pabon-Carrasco M, Martin-Gonzalez J J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(9):e1103-e1109.

PMID: 39399850 PMC: 11470452. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61844.


Identification of Middle Mesial Canal in Mandibular Molars Using Five Different Techniques: An Study.

Vamseekrishna K, Kukreja N, Sachdeva M, Ravi S, Chhabra S, Sachdeva S J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16(Suppl 3):S2350-S2352.

PMID: 39346433 PMC: 11426642. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_249_24.