» Articles » PMID: 26554630

Tolerability, Safety, and Quality of Life with Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Compared with Oxycodone/Naloxone PR in Patients with Severe Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label, Phase 3b/4 Trial

Overview
Journal Pain Pract
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2015 Nov 12
PMID 26554630
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate tolerability, safety, and quality-of-life outcomes in non-opioid-pretreated patients with severe chronic low back pain with a neuropathic component receiving tapentadol PR vs. oxycodone/naloxone PR.

Methods: Eligible patients (average pain intensity [numerical rating scale] ≥ 6; painDETECT positive/unclear ratings) were randomized to twice-daily tapentadol PR 50 mg or oxycodone/naloxone PR 10 mg/5 mg. After a 21-day titration (maximum twice-daily doses: tapentadol PR 250 mg, or oxycodone/naloxone PR 40 mg/20 mg plus oxycodone PR 10 mg), target doses were continued for 9 weeks. Change in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) total score from baseline to final evaluation was a primary endpoint.

Results: For the primary tolerability-related endpoint, the 97.5% exact repeated confidence interval for tapentadol PR minus oxycodone/naloxone PR for the PAC-SYM total score was [-0.259, 0.121], showing noninferiority (upper limit < 0.7). Incidences of constipation and vomiting were significantly lower with tapentadol PR than oxycodone/naloxone PR (P ≤ 0.045). Confirmatory superiority based on formal noninferiority was shown for the primary effectiveness endpoint (change from baseline to final evaluation in pain intensity) for tapentadol PR vs. oxycodone/naloxone PR (presented separately). Improvements in the Short Form-12 physical component summary and EuroQol-5 Dimension health status index and health state assessment were significantly greater with tapentadol PR vs. oxycodone/naloxone PR (P ≤ 0.024).

Conclusions: Tapentadol PR had a minimal impact on bowel function (noninferior to oxycodone/naloxone PR) and, along with superior effectiveness (presented separately), was associated with significantly lower incidences of constipation and vomiting and significant improvements in quality-of-life measures vs. oxycodone/naloxone PR.

Citing Articles

Differences in the Analgesic Effect of Opioids on Pain in Cancer Patients With Spinal Metastases.

Takemura M, Niki K, Okamoto Y, Tamura H, Kawamura T, Kohno M Palliat Med Rep. 2023; 4(1):220-230.

PMID: 37637760 PMC: 10457616. DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0018.


Chronic low back pain as a biopsychosocial disease: time to change our point of view.

Cuomo A, Cascella M, Vittori A, Marinangeli F J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023; 1(1):7.

PMID: 37386619 PMC: 10245422. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-021-00010-x.


Measures of sleep disturbance are not routinely captured in trials for chronic low back pain: a systematic scoping review of 282 trials.

Neilson B, Dickerson C, Young J, Shepherd M, Rhon D J Clin Sleep Med. 2023; 19(11):1961-1970.

PMID: 37259893 PMC: 10620655. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10672.


Effects of Opioids on Immune and Endocrine Function in Patients with Cancer Pain.

Bradley A, Boland J Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023; 24(7):867-879.

PMID: 37145383 PMC: 10271882. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01091-2.


Opioid-Induced Sexual Dysfunction in Cancer Patients.

Salata B, Kluczna A, Dzierzanowski T Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(16).

PMID: 36011039 PMC: 9406921. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164046.