» Articles » PMID: 26553376

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive-pressure Ventilation Within the Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy Approach in Preterm Infants: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Date 2015 Nov 11
PMID 26553376
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) as the initial respiratory support within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) approach in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.

Design: Prospective, randomised controlled study.

Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients And Interventions: This study enrolled 200 preterm infants with a gestational age of 26-32 weeks who showed signs of respiratory distress but did not require intubation in the delivery room. Surfactant therapy was performed using the MIST approach in the patients who met the criteria for surfactant administration.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were a need for intubation within the first 72 h of life and a surfactant requirement.

Results: The infants in the study displayed similar characteristics at birth. Fewer infants in the NIPPV group required surfactant therapy (38% vs 60%; p=0.002) or invasive ventilation during the first 72 h of life (13% vs 29%; p=0.005), and NIPPV reduced the rate of moderate-to-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (7% vs 16%; p=0.046). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NIPPV support (OR: 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.76; p=0.008) and higher gestational age (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98; p=0.041) reduced the need for invasive ventilation within the first 72 h of life. Surfactant requirement was also decreased with NIPPV support (OR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.71; p=0.002). However, there was no impact on BPD, based on the multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: In infants born at 26-32 weeks' gestation, NIPPV reduced the need for invasive ventilation and the surfactant requirement within the MIST approach.

Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01741129.

Citing Articles

What is new in synthetic lung surfactant protein technology?.

Walther F, Zasadzinski J, Waring A Expert Rev Respir Med. 2024; 18(12):913-917.

PMID: 39534910 PMC: 11717621. DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2429669.


Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art.

Hartel C, Kribs A, Gopel W, Dargaville P, Herting E Neonatology. 2024; 121(5):584-595.

PMID: 39226881 PMC: 11446307. DOI: 10.1159/000540078.


The Outcomes of Preterm Infants with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated by Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation.

Huang T, Chen H, Yang S, Su P, Chung H Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672192 PMC: 11048199. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040838.


Factors Associated With Failure of Non-invasive Ventilation in Preterm Neonates Requiring Initial Respiratory Support.

Nath A, Srivastava S, Sachan R, Shah D Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e53879.

PMID: 38465034 PMC: 10924949. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53879.


A clinical study evaluating the combination of LISA and SNIPPV for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.

Permall D, Zhang Y, Li H, Guan Y, Chen X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1429.

PMID: 38228632 PMC: 10792160. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50303-0.