» Articles » PMID: 26553366

Sex Differences in DNA Methylation Assessed by 450 K BeadChip in Newborns

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2015 Nov 11
PMID 26553366
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark that can potentially link early life exposures to adverse health outcomes later in life. Host factors like sex and age strongly influence biological variation of DNA methylation, but characterization of these relationships is still limited, particularly in young children.

Methods: In a sample of 111 Mexican-American subjects (58 girls , 53 boys), we interrogated DNA methylation differences by sex at birth using the 450 K BeadChip in umbilical cord blood specimens, adjusting for cell composition.

Results: We observed that ~3% of CpG sites were differentially methylated between girls and boys at birth (FDR P < 0.05). Of those CpGs, 3031 were located on autosomes, and 82.8% of those were hypermethylated in girls compared to boys. Beyond individual CpGs, we found 3604 sex-associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs) where the majority (75.8%) had higher methylation in girls. Using pathway analysis, we found that sex-associated autosomal CpGs were significantly enriched for gene ontology terms related to nervous system development and behavior. Among hits in our study, 35.9% had been previously reported as sex-associated CpG sites in other published human studies. Further, for replicated hits, the direction of the association with methylation was highly concordant (98.5-100%) with previous studies.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first reported epigenome-wide analysis by sex at birth that examined DMRs and adjusted for confounding by cell composition. We confirmed previously reported trends that methylation profiles are sex-specific even in autosomal genes, and also identified novel sex-associated CpGs in our methylome-wide analysis immediately after birth, a critical yet relatively unstudied developmental window.

Citing Articles

Epigenetic Mechanisms Underlying Sex Differences in Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Stoccoro A Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39857328 PMC: 11761232. DOI: 10.3390/biology14010098.


DNA Methylation Associates With Sex-Specific Effects of Experimentally Increased Yolk Testosterone in Wild Nestlings.

Sepers B, Ruuskanen S, van Mastrigt T, Mateman A, van Oers K Mol Ecol. 2025; 34(4):e17647.

PMID: 39758026 PMC: 11789551. DOI: 10.1111/mec.17647.


Characterizing DNA Methylation and Hydroxymethylation in Cord Blood and Identifying Sex-Specific Differences using the Illumina EPIC Array.

Petroff R, Dolinoy D, Padmanabhan V, Goodrich J Epigenet Rep. 2024; 2(1):1-7.

PMID: 39610770 PMC: 11600988. DOI: 10.1080/28361512.2024.2427955.


Prenatal chemical exposures and the methylome: current evidence and opportunities for environmental epigenetics.

Bozack A, Trasande L Epigenomics. 2024; 16(23-24):1443-1451.

PMID: 39539208 PMC: 11622816. DOI: 10.1080/17501911.2024.2426441.


Biological sex affects functional variation across the human genome.

Jones A, Connelly G, Dalapati T, Wang L, Schott B, San Roman A medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39281750 PMC: 11398442. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.03.24313025.


References
1.
Yousefi P, Huen K, Aguilar Schall R, Decker A, Elboudwarej E, Quach H . Considerations for normalization of DNA methylation data by Illumina 450K BeadChip assay in population studies. Epigenetics. 2013; 8(11):1141-52. PMC: 6242262. DOI: 10.4161/epi.26037. View

2.
Hall E, Volkov P, Dayeh T, Esguerra J, Salo S, Eliasson L . Sex differences in the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern and impact on gene expression, microRNA levels and insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):522. PMC: 4256841. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0522-z. View

3.
Wang J, Duncan D, Shi Z, Zhang B . WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Web Server issue):W77-83. PMC: 3692109. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt439. View

4.
Peca J, Feliciano C, Ting J, Wang W, Wells M, Venkatraman T . Shank3 mutant mice display autistic-like behaviours and striatal dysfunction. Nature. 2011; 472(7344):437-42. PMC: 3090611. DOI: 10.1038/nature09965. View

5.
Wilson C, Davies D . The control of sexual differentiation of the reproductive system and brain. Reproduction. 2007; 133(2):331-59. DOI: 10.1530/REP-06-0078. View