Disc Degeneration Implies Low Back Pain

Overview

Journal Theor Biol Med Model

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2015 Nov 11

PMID 26552736

Citations 38

Authors

Chang-Jiang Zheng

James Chen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Low back pain exerts a tremendous burden on individual patients and society due to its prevalence and ability to cause long-term disability. Contemporary treatment and prevention efforts are stymied by the absence of a confirmed cause for the majority of low back pain patients.

Methods: A system dynamics approach is used to build a physiologically-based model investigating the relationship between disc degeneration and low back pain. The model's predictions are evaluated under two different types of study designs and compared with established observations on low back pain.

Results: A three-compartment model (no disc degeneration, disc degeneration with pain remission, disc degeneration with pain recurrence) accurately predicts the age-specific prevalence observed in one of the largest population-based surveys (R (2) = 0.998). The estimated transition age at which intervertebral discs lose the growth potential and begin degenerating is 13.3 years. The estimated disc degeneration rate is 0.0344/year. Without any additional change being made to parameter's values, the model also fully accounts for the age-specific prevalence of disc degeneration detected with a lumbar MRI among asymptomatic individuals (R (2) = 0.978).

Conclusions: Dual testing of the proposed mechanistic model with two independent data sources (one with lumbar MRI and the other without) confirm that disc degeneration is the driving force behind and cause of age dependence in low back pain. Observed complexity of low back pain epidemiology arises from the slow dynamics of disc degeneration coupled with the fast dynamics of disease recurrence.

Citing Articles

Systematic analysis of lysine lactylation in nucleus pulposus cells.

Sheng L, Xu H, Wang Y, Ni J, Xiang T, Xu H iScience. 2024; 27(11):111157.

PMID: 39524337 PMC: 11546124. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111157.

LTF ameliorates cartilage endplate degeneration by suppressing calcification, senescence and matrix degradation through the JAK2/STAT3 pathway.

Li T, Liu Y, Cao J, Pan C, Ding R, Zhao J J Cell Mol Med. 2024; 28(19):e18267.

PMID: 39392081 PMC: 11467740. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.18267.

Qualitative and Quantitative MR Imaging of the Cartilaginous Endplate: A Review.

Wei Z, Athertya J, Chung C, Bydder G, Chang E, Du J J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024; 61(4):1552-1571.

PMID: 39165086 PMC: 11839955. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29562.

Automatic measurement of anatomical parameters of the lumbar vertebral body and the intervertebral disc on radiographs by deep learning.

Yao H, Zhang Z, Cheng G, Chen X, He L, Wang W Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(8):5877-5890.

PMID: 39143991 PMC: 11320507. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1859.

Static magnetic field-modulated mesenchymal stem cell-derived mitochondria-containing microvesicles for enhanced intervertebral disc degeneration therapy.

Shi P, Gao H, Cheng Z, Zhao K, Chen Y, Chen X J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):457.

PMID: 39085827 PMC: 11290117. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02728-6.

References

Boden S, DAVIS D, Dina T, Patronas N, Wiesel S . Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(3):403-8. View

Modic M, Steinberg P, Ross J, Masaryk T, Carter J . Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988; 166(1 Pt 1):193-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336678. View

Waddell G . 1987 Volvo award in clinical sciences. A new clinical model for the treatment of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987; 12(7):632-44. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00002. View

Powell M, Wilson M, Szypryt P, Symonds E, Worthington B . Prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration observed by magnetic resonance in symptomless women. Lancet. 1986; 2(8520):1366-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92008-8. View

Lutz G, Butzlaff M, Schultz-Venrath U . Looking back on back pain: trial and error of diagnoses in the 20th century. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(16):1899-905. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083365.41261.CF. View

Elfering A, Semmer N, Birkhofer D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N . Risk factors for lumbar disc degeneration: a 5-year prospective MRI study in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(2):125-34. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00002. View

Pfirrmann C, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N . Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(17):1873-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011. View

Steffens D, Hancock M, Maher C, Williams C, Jensen T, Latimer J . Does magnetic resonance imaging predict future low back pain? A systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2013; 18(6):755-65. DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00427.x. View

Thiese M, Hegmann K, Wood E, Garg A, Moore J, Kapellusch J . Low-back pain ratings for lifetime, 1-month period, and point prevalences in a large occupational population. Hum Factors. 2014; 56(1):86-97. DOI: 10.1177/0018720813493641. View

10.

Horvath G, Koroknai G, Acs B, Than P, Illes T . Prevalence of low back pain and lumbar spine degenerative disorders. Questionnaire survey and clinical-radiological analysis of a representative Hungarian population. Int Orthop. 2009; 34(8):1245-9. PMC: 2989066. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0920-0. View

11.

Hancock M, Maher C, Macaskill P, Latimer J, Kos W, Pik J . MRI findings are more common in selected patients with acute low back pain than controls?. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(2):240-6. PMC: 3265593. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1955-7. View

12.

Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F . A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64(6):2028-37. DOI: 10.1002/art.34347. View

13.

Carragee E, Alamin T, Cheng I, Franklin T, van den Haak E, Hurwitz E . Are first-time episodes of serious LBP associated with new MRI findings?. Spine J. 2006; 6(6):624-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.005. View

14.

Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B . Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(18):2003-13. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018. View

15.

Salminen J, Erkintalo M, Laine M, Pentti J . Low back pain in the young. A prospective three-year follow-up study of subjects with and without low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(19):2101-7; discussion 2108. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00006. View

16.

Salo S, Paajanen H, Alanen A . Disc degeneration of pediatric patients in lumbar MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 1995; 25(3):186-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02021530. View

17.

Jensen M, Brant-Zawadzki M, Obuchowski N, Modic M, Malkasian D, Ross J . Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(2):69-73. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201. View

18.

Rodrigues L, Kirkwood B . Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. Int J Epidemiol. 1990; 19(1):205-13. DOI: 10.1093/ije/19.1.205. View