» Articles » PMID: 26550008

Can We Resist Another Person's Gaze?

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Nov 10
PMID 26550008
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adaptive adjustments of strategies are needed to optimize behavior in a dynamic and uncertain world. A key function in implementing flexible behavior and exerting self-control is represented by the ability to stop the execution of an action when it is no longer appropriate for the environmental requests. Importantly, stimuli in our environment are not equally relevant and some are more valuable than others. One example is the gaze of other people, which is known to convey important social information about their direction of attention and their emotional and mental states. Indeed, gaze direction has a significant impact on the execution of voluntary saccades of an observer since it is capable of inducing in the observer an automatic gaze-following behavior: a phenomenon named social or joint attention. Nevertheless, people can exert volitional inhibitory control on saccadic eye movements during their planning. Little is known about the interaction between gaze direction signals and volitional inhibition of saccades. To fill this gap, we administered a countermanding task to 15 healthy participants in which they were asked to observe the eye region of a face with the eyes shut appearing at central fixation. In one condition, participants were required to suppress a saccade, that was previously instructed by a gaze shift toward one of two peripheral targets, when the eyes were suddenly shut down (social condition, SC). In a second condition, participants were asked to inhibit a saccade, that was previously instructed by a change in color of one of the two same targets, when a change of color of a central picture occurred (non-social condition, N-SC). We found that inhibitory control was more impaired in the SC, suggesting that actions initiated and stopped by social cues conveyed by the eyes are more difficult to withhold. This is probably due to the social value intrinsically linked to these cues and the many uses we make of them.

Citing Articles

Effects of others' gaze and facial expression on an observer's microsaccades and their association with ADHD tendencies.

Motomura Y, Hayashi S, Kurose R, Yoshida H, Okada T, Higuchi S J Physiol Anthropol. 2023; 42(1):19.

PMID: 37679805 PMC: 10486107. DOI: 10.1186/s40101-023-00335-2.


Looking Into Mona Lisa's Smiling Eyes: Allusion to an Illusion.

Zavagno D, Actis-Grosso R, Daneyko O Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:878288.

PMID: 35845241 PMC: 9283865. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.878288.


Are You "Gazing" at Me? How Others' Gaze Direction and Facial Expression Influence Gaze Perception and Postural Control.

Lebert A, Chaby L, Guillin A, Chekroun S, Vergilino-Perez D Front Psychol. 2022; 12:730953.

PMID: 35002834 PMC: 8733602. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730953.


Gaze and Arrows: The Effect of Element Orientation on Apparent Motion is Modulated by Attention.

Actis-Grosso R, Ricciardelli P Vision (Basel). 2019; 1(3).

PMID: 31740646 PMC: 6835572. DOI: 10.3390/vision1030021.


Context Modulates Congruency Effects in Selective Attention to Social Cues.

Ravagli A, Marini F, Marino B, Ricciardelli P Front Psychol. 2018; 9:940.

PMID: 29946281 PMC: 6005850. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00940.


References
1.
Federico P, Mirabella G . Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements. Exp Brain Res. 2014; 232(4):1293-307. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3846-8. View

2.
Verbruggen F, Logan G . Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009; 35(3):835-54. PMC: 2690716. DOI: 10.1037/a0012726. View

3.
Hanes D, Carpenter R . Countermanding saccades in humans. Vision Res. 1999; 39(16):2777-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00011-5. View

4.
Lakens D . Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:863. PMC: 3840331. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. View

5.
de Jong R, Coles M, Logan G, Gratton G . In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990; 16(1):164-182. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.164. View