» Articles » PMID: 26541184

A 5-year Survival Analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 Metal-on-metal Total Hip Prostheses

Overview
Journal Hip Int
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2015 Nov 7
PMID 26541184
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasties (THA) are associated with high failure rates and possible pseudotumour formation. This study reports the first results of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 large-head MoM total hip articulations.

Patients And Methods: From 2006 to 2010 the Reinier de Graaf Hospital implanted 160 large-head Magnum M2 MoM THAs (Biomet Inc. Warsaw, Indiana, USA) in 150 patients. These patients were recalled after a warning from the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. Patients were offered a clinical and radiographic assessment of the hip prosthesis, serum control on cobalt and chromium ions, and an ultrasound of the hip. If indicated, additional MARS-MRI or CT scan was performed. Descriptive statistical analysis, correlations, t-tests, non-parametric tests and implant survival were calculated.

Results: The mean follow-up was 6.1 years (4.8-8.4). A cumulative survival rate of 93.1% (95% CI: 88.3-98%) was found after 5 years. Reasons for revision were loosening, pain, infection and pseudotumour formation. The prevalence of pseudotumour formation around the prostheses was 8.75%.

Conclusions: This study reports the first results of 160 MoM THAs implanted in our clinic from 2006-2010. In total, 13 (8.1%) of the THAs were eligible for revision after the recall. In most patients the reason for revision was pseudotumour formation. A total of 14 (8.75%) pseudotumours were diagnosed at the first recall. These results show that a comprehensive follow-up strategy is essential for MoM THAs to promptly identify and manage early complications.

Citing Articles

Ten-year results of a prospective cohort of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty : a concise follow-up of a previous report.

van Lingen C, Ettema H, Bosker B, Verheyen C Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(1):61-67.

PMID: 35043691 PMC: 9047076. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0159.R1.


A Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up Experience with a Specific Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty Design.

Carulli C, Sani G, Matassi F, Civinini R, Innocenti M Joints. 2021; 7(3):91-97.

PMID: 34195536 PMC: 8236331. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710388.


Immunological Responses to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Man K, Jiang L, Foster R, Yang X J Funct Biomater. 2017; 8(3).

PMID: 28762999 PMC: 5618284. DOI: 10.3390/jfb8030033.


Clinical and Wear Analyses of 9 Large Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Prostheses.

Koper M, Mathijssen N, Witt F, Morlock M, Vehmeijer S PLoS One. 2016; 11(10):e0163438.

PMID: 27711119 PMC: 5053776. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163438.