» Articles » PMID: 26529119

Effects of Training Pre-movement Sensorimotor Rhythms on Behavioral Performance

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2015 Nov 4
PMID 26529119
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology might contribute to rehabilitation of motor function. This speculation is based on the premise that modifying the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity will modify behavior, a proposition for which there is limited empirical data. The present study asked whether learned modulation of pre-movement sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) activity can affect motor performance in normal human subjects.

Approach: Eight individuals first performed a joystick-based cursor-movement task with variable warning periods. Targets appeared randomly on a video monitor and subjects moved the cursor to the target and pressed a select button within 2 s. SMR features in the pre-movement EEG that correlated with performance speed and accuracy were identified. The subjects then learned to increase or decrease these features to control a two-target BCI task. Following successful BCI training, they were asked to increase or decrease SMR amplitude in order to initiate the joystick task.

Main Results: After BCI training, pre-movement SMR amplitude was correlated with performance in subjects with initial poor performance: lower amplitude was associated with faster and more accurate movement. The beneficial effect on performance of lower SMR amplitude was greater in subjects with lower initial performance levels.

Significance: These results indicate that BCI-based SMR training can affect a standard motor behavior. They provide a rationale for studies that integrate such training into rehabilitation protocols and examine its capacity to enhance restoration of useful motor function.

Citing Articles

Enhancing neurorehabilitation by targeting beneficial plasticity.

Wolpaw J, Thompson A Front Rehabil Sci. 2023; 4:1198679.

PMID: 37456795 PMC: 10338914. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1198679.


Targeting neuroplasticity to improve motor recovery after stroke: an artificial neural network model.

Norman S, Wolpaw J, Reinkensmeyer D Brain Commun. 2022; 4(6):fcac264.

PMID: 36458210 PMC: 9700163. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac264.


Subthalamic beta-targeted neurofeedback speeds up movement initiation but increases tremor in Parkinsonian patients.

He S, Mostofi A, Syed E, Torrecillos F, Tinkhauser G, Fischer P Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 33205752 PMC: 7695453. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60979.


Neurofeedback-Linked Suppression of Cortical β Bursts Speeds Up Movement Initiation in Healthy Motor Control: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study.

He S, Everest-Phillips C, Clouter A, Brown P, Tan H J Neurosci. 2020; 40(20):4021-4032.

PMID: 32284339 PMC: 7219286. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-20.2020.


Modeling the Ongoing Dynamics of Short and Long-Range Temporal Correlations in Broadband EEG During Movement.

Wairagkar M, Hayashi Y, Nasuto S Front Syst Neurosci. 2019; 13:66.

PMID: 31787885 PMC: 6856010. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00066.


References
1.
Pashler H . Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull. 1994; 116(2):220-44. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220. View

2.
Cohen O, Sherman E, Zinger N, Perlmutter S, Prut Y . Getting ready to move: transmitted information in the corticospinal pathway during preparation for movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010; 20(6):696-703. PMC: 3153449. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.09.001. View

3.
Kostov A, Polak M . Parallel man-machine training in development of EEG-based cursor control. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000; 8(2):203-5. DOI: 10.1109/86.847816. View

4.
Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, McDonough S, Crosbie J . Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010; 7:60. PMC: 3017056. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-60. View

5.
Wolpaw J, Birbaumer N, McFarland D, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan T . Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(6):767-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3. View