» Articles » PMID: 26526083

Cost Utility of Competing Strategies to Prevent Endoscopic Transmission of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2015 Nov 4
PMID 26526083
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Prior reports have linked patient transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE, or "superbug") to endoscopes used during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We performed a decision analysis to measure the cost-effectiveness of four competing strategies for CRE risk management.

Methods: We used decision analysis to calculate the cost-effectiveness of four approaches to reduce the risk of CRE transmission among patients presenting to the hospital for symptomatic common bile duct stones. The strategies included the following: (1) perform ERCP followed by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended endoscope reprocessing procedures; (2) perform ERCP followed by "endoscope culture and hold"; (3) perform ERCP followed by ethylene oxide (EtO) sterilization of the endoscope; and (4) stop performing ERCP in lieu of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Our outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

Results: In the base-case scenario, ERCP with FDA-recommended endoscope reprocessing was the most cost-effective strategy. Both the ERCP with culture and hold ($4,228,170/QALY) and ERCP with EtO sterilization ($50,572,348/QALY) strategies had unacceptable incremental costs per QALY gained. LC with CBDE was dominated, being both more costly and marginally less effective vs. the alternatives. In sensitivity analysis, ERCP with culture and hold became the most cost-effective approach when the pretest probability of CRE exceeded 24%.

Conclusions: In institutions with a low CRE prevalence, ERCP with FDA-recommended reprocessing is the most cost-effective approach for mitigating CRE transmission risk. Only in settings with an extremely high CRE prevalence did ERCP with culture and hold become cost-effective.

Citing Articles

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation, and laparoscopic hepatectomy for intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stones.

Chen Z, Fu H World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025; 17(1):100544.

PMID: 39872759 PMC: 11757201. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100544.


A dynamic flow model mimicking duodenoscope reprocessing after bacterial contamination for translational research.

Heuvelmans M, Woudstra W, Wunderink H, Monkelbaan J, van der Mei H Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022; 2(1):e153.

PMID: 36483362 PMC: 9726593. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.294.


A narrative review on current duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and novel developments.

Heuvelmans M, Wunderink H, van der Mei H, Monkelbaan J Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021; 10(1):171.

PMID: 34949217 PMC: 8697464. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-01037-z.


Cost-effectiveness of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) surveillance in Maryland.

Lin G, Tseng K, Gatalo O, Martinez D, Hinson J, Milstone A Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021; 43(9):1162-1170.

PMID: 34674791 PMC: 9023597. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.361.


Improving the Reprocessing Quality of Flexible Thermolabile Endoscopes: How to Learn from Mistakes.

Casini B, Tuvo B, Marciano E, Del Magro G, Gemignani G, Luchini G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(5).

PMID: 33802350 PMC: 7967619. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052482.


References
1.
Neumann P, Cohen J, Weinstein M . Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(9):796-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1405158. View

2.
Rutala W, Weber D . Gastrointestinal endoscopes: a need to shift from disinfection to sterilization?. JAMA. 2014; 312(14):1405-6. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.12559. View

3.
Epstein L, Hunter J, Arwady M, Tsai V, Stein L, Gribogiannis M . New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli associated with exposure to duodenoscopes. JAMA. 2014; 312(14):1447-55. PMC: 10877559. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.12720. View

4.
Ducomble T, Faucheux S, Helbig U, Kaisers U, Konig B, Knaust A . Large hospital outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: investigating mortality and the impact of screening for KPC-2 with polymerase chain reaction. J Hosp Infect. 2015; 89(3):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.012. View

5.
Smith Z, Oh Y, Saeian K, Edmiston Jr C, Khan A, Massey B . Transmission of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae during ERCP: time to revisit the current reprocessing guidelines. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(4):1041-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.006. View