» Articles » PMID: 26525988

Provider Preferences and Experiences With a Countywide Centralized Collaborative Reminder/Recall for Childhood Immunizations

Overview
Journal Acad Pediatr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Nov 4
PMID 26525988
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess among providers in 7 Colorado counties where a collaborative centralized reminder/recall (CC-R/R) using the Colorado Immunization Information System (CIIS) was performed: 1) preferences about CC-R/R conducted by the public health department (PHD); 2) preferences for future CC-R/R for different vaccines with and without practice names; and 3) experiences with including their name on CC-R/R notices.

Methods: A mailed survey was sent to all primary care sites where CC-R/R had been previously conducted. Respondents self-identified as the "the person in charge of immunization policy within the practice."

Results: Overall response rate was 69.9% (160 of 229). Twenty-one were removed because they did not provide immunizations to children. Among respondents, 65.0% were from family medicine and 26.3% from pediatric practices; 32.1% physicians or midlevel providers; 34.3% nurses or medical assistants; and 33.6% office managers. Taking into account all issues, 57.6% were "okay" with either the PHD or their practice conducting recall; 27.3% preferred the PHD; and 14.4% preferred their practice conduct R/R. Fifty-six percent of active CIIS practices (n = 95) included their practice's name on CC-R/R notices. Interest in future CC-R/R for different ages and vaccines was strongly related to whether reminders included the practice name: 77.8% for routine immunizations in 4- to 6-year-olds; 74.8% for immunizations for 0- to 3-year-olds; 73.3% for vaccines administered to adolescents; and 59.7% for influenza (P < .001).

Conclusions: Most practices are accepting of the PHD centrally conducting R/R, but most prefer collaboration that includes their name. Given the success and support of this method, it should be more widely adopted.

Citing Articles

The potential for centralized reminder/recall to increase immunization rates: A national survey of immunization information systems (IIS) managers.

Saville A, Gurfinkel D, Beaty B, Chi A, Dayton A, Hurley L Prev Med Rep. 2021; 21:101296.

PMID: 33489724 PMC: 7808944. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101296.


Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?-a systematic review.

French C, Pinnock H, Forbes G, Skene I, Taylor S Trials. 2020; 21(1):916.

PMID: 33168067 PMC: 7650157. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04762-9.


Effect of State Immunization Information System Centralized Reminder and Recall on HPV Vaccination Rates.

Szilagyi P, Albertin C, Gurfinkel D, Beaty B, Zhou X, Vangala S Pediatrics. 2020; 145(5).

PMID: 32253263 PMC: 7193977. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-2689.


Centralized Reminder/Recall to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates: A Two-State Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Kempe A, Saville A, Albertin C, Helmkamp L, Zhou X, Vangela S Acad Pediatr. 2019; 20(3):374-383.

PMID: 31698085 PMC: 7477488. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.10.015.


Supporting and sustaining centralized reminder/recall for immunizations: Qualitative insights from stakeholders.

Fisher M, Gurfinkel D, Szilagyi P, Saville A, Albertin C, Breck A Vaccine. 2019; 37(44):6601-6608.

PMID: 31562003 PMC: 7477484. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.055.