Hemodynamic Safety and Efficacy of Ferumoxytol As an Intravenous Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of off-label use of ferumoxytol as an intravenous MRI contrast agents in pediatric patients and young adults.
Materials And Methods: With HIPAA compliance and IRB approval, 86 consecutive patients who had undergone 3 T or 1.5 T MRI with ferumoxytol were retrospectively identified. The blood pressure and heart rate of patients before and after ferumoxytol injection were compared. The overall image quality was evaluated independently by two radiologists with a four-point scale. Interobserver agreement was calculated using weighted kappa statistics.
Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) pre and post-contrast systolic blood pressures (SBP) were 101±18 and 95±20, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between pre-SBP and post-SBP (P=0.003). The pre-contrast diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the post-contrast diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 60±14 and 51±17, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between pre-DBP and post-DBP (P<0.001). The number of patients with SBP and DBP increase, SBP increase and DBP decrease, SBP decrease and DBP increase, SBP and DBP decrease, SBP increase and DBP unchanged were 14 (16%), 9 (10%), 6 (7%), 56 (65%), 1 (1%), respectively. There was moderate agreement on all individual assessments of image quality (kappa=0.45). Eighty-two of 86 (95.4%) studies were scored 3 or above (at least diagnostic quality) by both readers, with 90% confidence interval of 92-99%.
Conclusion: Ferumoxytol is effective as an MR contrast agent. In our sample, there was on average a small but clinically insignificant drop in SBP and DBP post-contrast injection. Large, randomized, controlled trials are needed to establish optimal dosing, imaging procedures, and safety monitoring.
Renella P, Li J, Prosper A, Finn J, Nguyen K Children (Basel). 2022; 9(12).
PMID: 36553257 PMC: 9777095. DOI: 10.3390/children9121810.
Jalili M, Yu T, Hassani C, Prosper A, Finn J, Bedayat A Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2022; 4(4):e210323.
PMID: 36059381 PMC: 9434982. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.210323.
Emerging Application of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer.
Alromi D, Madani S, Seifalian A Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(23).
PMID: 34883649 PMC: 8659429. DOI: 10.3390/polym13234146.
USPIOs as targeted contrast agents in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Lu Y, Huang J, Neverova N, Nguyen K Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2021; 14(2).
PMID: 33824694 PMC: 8021129. DOI: 10.1007/s12410-021-09552-8.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Structure-Function Relationships in Heart Failure.
Nguyen K, Hu P, Finn J Heart Fail Clin. 2020; 17(1):9-24.
PMID: 33220890 PMC: 8171432. DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2020.08.001.