» Articles » PMID: 26514609

3D T2 MR Imaging-Based Measurements of the Posterior Cervical Thecal Sac in Flexion and Extension for Cervical Puncture

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Oct 31
PMID 26514609
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: The current standard technique for cervical puncture involves prone positioning with neck extension. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of the posterior cervical thecal sac during neck flexion and extension in supine and prone positions by using high-resolution MR imaging to help determine the optimal positioning for cervical puncture.

Materials And Methods: High-resolution T2-weighted MR imaging was performed of the cervical spine in 10 adult volunteers 18 years of age and older. Exclusion criteria included the following: a history of cervical spine injury/surgery, neck pain, and degenerative spondylosis. Images of sagittal 3D sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions were obtained in the following neck positions: supine extension, supine flexion, prone extension, and prone flexion. The degree of neck flexion and extension and the distance from the posterior margin of the spinal cord to the posterior aspect of the C1-C2 thecal sac were measured in each position.

Results: The mean anteroposterior size of the posterior C1-C2 thecal sac was as follows: 4.76 mm for supine extension, 3.63 mm for supine flexion, 5.00 mm for prone extension, and 4.00 mm for prone flexion. Neck extension yielded a larger CSF space than flexion, independent of supine/prone positioning. There was no correlation with neck angle and thecal sac size.

Conclusions: The posterior C1-C2 thecal sac is larger with neck extension than flexion, independent of prone or supine positioning. Given that this space is the target for cervical puncture, findings suggest that extension is the ideal position for performing the procedure, and the decision for prone-versus-supine positioning can be made on the basis of operator comfort and patient preference/ability.

Citing Articles

Pontomedullary junction as a reference for spinal cord cross-sectional area: validation across neck positions.

Bedard S, Bouthillier M, Cohen-Adad J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13527.

PMID: 37598229 PMC: 10439961. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40731-3.


Normal range of clivoaxial angle in adults using flexion and extension cervical magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Sayah A, Farley A, Munoz E, Sandhu F, Berkowitz F Neuroradiol J. 2021; 34(4):348-354.

PMID: 33678065 PMC: 8447823. DOI: 10.1177/1971400921998982.


C1 Posterior Arch Flare Point: A Useful Landmark for Fluoroscopically Guided C1-2 Puncture.

Peckham M, Shah L, Tsai A, Quigley 3rd E, Cramer J, Hutchins T AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018; 39(8):1562-1567.

PMID: 29930095 PMC: 7410560. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5706.

References
1.
Bartlett R, Hill C, Rigby A, Chandrasekaran S, Narayanamurthy H . MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?. Br J Radiol. 2012; 85(1016):1044-51. PMC: 3587072. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/94315429. View

2.
Orrison W, Sackett J, Amundsen P . Lateral C1-2 puncture for cervical myelography. Part II: Recognition of improper injection of contrast material. Radiology. 1983; 146(2):395-400. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.146.2.6687369. View

3.
Mapstone T, Rekate H, Shurin S . Quadriplegia secondary to hematoma after lateral C-1, C-2 puncture in a leukemic child. Neurosurgery. 1983; 12(2):230-1. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198302000-00020. View

4.
Ulbrich E, Schraner C, Boesch C, Hodler J, Busato A, Anderson S . Normative MR cervical spinal canal dimensions. Radiology. 2014; 271(1):172-82. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13120370. View

5.
Servo A, Laasonen E . Accidental introduction of contrast medium into the cervical spinal cord. A case report. Neuroradiology. 1985; 27(1):80-2. DOI: 10.1007/BF00342522. View