» Articles » PMID: 26504788

Do Italian Companies Manage Work-Related Stress Effectively? A Process Evaluation in Implementing the INAIL Methodology

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Oct 28
PMID 26504788
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies on Intervention Process Evaluation are attracting growing attention in the literature on interventions linked to stress and the wellbeing of workers. There is evidence that some elements relating to the process and content of an intervention may have a decisive role in implementing it by facilitating or hindering the effectiveness of the results. This study aimed to provide a process evaluation on interventions to assess and manage risks related to work-related stress using a methodological path offered by INAIL. The final sample is composed of 124 companies participating to an interview on aspects relating to each phase of the INAIL methodological path put in place to implement the intervention. INAIL methodology has been defined as useful in the process of assessing and managing the risks related to work-related stress. Some factors related to the process (e.g., implementation of a preliminary phase, workers' involvement, and use of external consultants) showed a role in significant differences that emerged in the levels of risk, particularly in relation to findings from the preliminary assessment. Main findings provide information on the key aspects of process and content that are useful in implementing an intervention for assessing and managing risks related to work-related stress.

Citing Articles

Improving the Process of Managing Psychosocial Risks in Organizations.

Saik P, Tsopa V, Cheberyachko S, Deryugin O, Sokurenko S, Suima I Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024; 17:2997-3016.

PMID: 39654550 PMC: 11626964. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S488263.


Evaluating well-being and psychosocial risks in academia: Is management the "forgotten phase"?.

Bruno A, DellAversana G, Gilardi S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1349589.

PMID: 39021657 PMC: 11252066. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349589.


Relationship Between Occupational Safety and Health Policy Principles, Organizational Action on Work-related Stress and the Psychosocial Work Environment in Italy.

Leka S, Torres L, Jain A, Tecco C, Russo S, Iavicoli S Saf Health Work. 2024; 14(4):425-430.

PMID: 38187203 PMC: 10770050. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.10.001.


Demand-Resource Profiles and Job Satisfaction in the Healthcare Sector: A Person-Centered Examination Using Bayesian Informative Hypothesis Testing.

Marzocchi I, Ghezzi V, Tecco C, Ronchetti M, Ciampa V, Olivo I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(2).

PMID: 36673725 PMC: 9858661. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20020967.


How Much Does My Work Affect My Health? The Relationships between Working Conditions and Health in an Italian Survey.

Ronchetti M, Russo S, Tecco C, Iavicoli S Saf Health Work. 2021; 12(3):370-376.

PMID: 34527399 PMC: 8430439. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.04.002.


References
1.
Leka S, Jain A, Cox T, Kortum E . The development of the European framework for psychosocial risk management: PRIMA-EF. J Occup Health. 2011; 53(2):137-43. DOI: 10.1539/joh.o10010. View

2.
Langenhan M, Leka S, Jain A . Psychosocial risks: is risk management strategic enough in business and policy making?. Saf Health Work. 2013; 4(2):87-94. PMC: 3732138. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2013.04.003. View

3.
Rondinone B, Persechino B, Castaldi T, Valenti A, Ferrante P, Ronchetti M . Work-related stress risk assessment in Italy: the validation study of health safety and executive indicator tool. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2013; 34(4):392-9. View

4.
Marinaccio A, Ferrante P, Corfiati M, Tecco C, Rondinone B, Bonafede M . The relevance of socio-demographic and occupational variables for the assessment of work-related stress risk. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1157. PMC: 4029374. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1157. View

5.
Nielsen K, Randall R . The importance of employee participation and perceptions of changes in procedures in a teamworking intervention. Work Stress. 2012; 26(2):91-111. PMC: 3379743. DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2012.682721. View