» Articles » PMID: 26500716

Cardiac CT Vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert Recommendations

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Oct 27
PMID 26500716
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease represent a major challenge to our health care systems affecting millions of patients each year. Until recently, the diagnosis of coronary artery disease could be conclusively determined only by invasive coronary angiography. To avoid risks from cardiac catheterization, many healthcare systems relied on stress testing as gatekeeper for coronary angiography. Advancements in cardiac computed tomography angiography technology now allows to noninvasively visualize coronary artery disease, challenging the role of stress testing as the default noninvasive imaging tool for evaluating patients with chest pain. In this review, we summarize current data on the clinical utility of cardiac computed tomography and stress testing in stable patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Citing Articles

Ten things to know about ten imaging studies: A preventive cardiology perspective ("ASPC top ten imaging").

Bays H, Khera A, Blaha M, Budoff M, Toth P Am J Prev Cardiol. 2021; 6:100176.

PMID: 34327499 PMC: 8315431. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2021.100176.


Nourin-Dependent miR-137 and miR-106b: Novel Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Myocardial Ischemia in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Elgebaly S, Christenson R, Kandil H, Ibrahim M, Rizk H, El-Khazragy N Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(4).

PMID: 33919942 PMC: 8070915. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11040703.


Role of cardiac nuclear stress perfusion exam after computed tomographic coronary angiogram for evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with chest pain.

Gul M, Sheikh M, Chaudhry A, Gerges L, Al Halabi H, Feldman E J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(9):5067-5077.

PMID: 33145083 PMC: 7578483. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-pitd-12.


Myocardial Perfusion by Coronary Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia: Simultaneous Stress Protocol with SPECT.

Ker W, Neves D, Magalhaes T, Dos Santos A, Mesquita C, Nacif M Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113(6):1092-1101.

PMID: 31596324 PMC: 7021272. DOI: 10.5935/abc.20190201.


The Effect of Effort Test on the Levels of Ischemia Modified Albumin, 7-ketocholesterol and Cholestan-3β , 5α , 6β -triol and their Role in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.

Keles M, Samadi A, Isikhan S, Sener Y, Sezgin A, Keles E J Med Biochem. 2019; 38(3):249-255.

PMID: 31156334 PMC: 6534955. DOI: 10.2478/jomb-2018-0028.


References
1.
Schwitter J, Wacker C, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K . MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a.... Eur Heart J. 2012; 34(10):775-81. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs022. View

2.
Underwood S, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M, Ell P, Flint E, Harbinson M . Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004; 31(2):261-91. PMC: 2562441. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5. View

3.
Ko B, Cameron J, Meredith I, Leung M, Antonis P, Nasis A . Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011; 33(1):67-77. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr268. View

4.
Shaw L, Berman D, Maron D, Mancini G, Hayes S, Hartigan P . Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008; 117(10):1283-91. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743963. View

5.
Min J, Berman D, Budoff M, Jaffer F, Leipsic J, Leon M . Rationale and design of the DeFACTO (Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic AngiOgraphy) study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5(5):301-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.08.003. View