» Articles » PMID: 26500186

Twitter-Delivered Behavioral Weight-Loss Interventions: A Pilot Series

Overview
Journal JMIR Res Protoc
Publisher JMIR Publications
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Oct 27
PMID 26500186
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Lifestyle interventions are efficacious at reducing risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease but have not had a significant public health impact given high cost and patient and provider burden.

Objective: Online social networks may reduce the burden of lifestyle interventions to the extent that they displace in-person visits and may enhance opportunities for social support for weight loss.

Methods: We conducted an iterative series of pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using online social networks to deliver a lifestyle intervention.

Results: In Study 1 (n=10), obese participants with depression received lifestyle counseling via 12 weekly group visits and a private group formed using the online social network, Twitter. Mean weight loss was 2.3 pounds (SD 7.7; range -19.2 to 8.2) or 1.2% (SD 3.6) of baseline weight. A total of 67% (6/9) of participants completing exit interviews found the support of the Twitter group at least somewhat useful. In Study 2 (n=11), participants were not depressed and were required to be regular users of social media. Participants lost, on average, 5.6 pounds (SD 6.3; range -15 to 0) or 3.0% (SD 3.4) of baseline weight, and 100% (9/9) completing exit interviews found the support of the Twitter group at least somewhat useful. To explore the feasibility of eliminating in-person visits, in Study 3 (n=12), we delivered a 12-week lifestyle intervention almost entirely via Twitter by limiting the number of group visits to one, while using the same inclusion criteria as that used in Study 2. Participants lost, on average, 5.4 pounds (SD 6.4; range -14.2 to 3.9) or 3.0% (SD 3.1) of baseline weight, and 90% (9/10) completing exit interviews found the support of the Twitter group at least somewhat useful. Findings revealed that a private Twitter weight-loss group was both feasible and acceptable for many patients, particularly among regular users of social media.

Conclusions: Future research should evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of online social network-delivered lifestyle interventions relative to traditional modalities.

Citing Articles

The Mobile lifestyle intervention for food and exercise (mLife) study: Protocol of a remote behavioral weight loss randomized clinical trial for type 2 diabetes prevention.

DuBois K, Delgado-Diaz D, McGrievy M, Valafar H, Monroe C, Wilcox S Contemp Clin Trials. 2024; 148:107735.

PMID: 39522630 PMC: 11700768. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107735.


Best Practices for Designing and Testing Behavioral and Health Communication Interventions for Delivery in Private Facebook Groups: Tutorial.

Pagoto S, Lueders N, Palmer L, Idiong C, Bannor R, Xu R JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e58627.

PMID: 39231426 PMC: 11411228. DOI: 10.2196/58627.


Randomized non-inferiority trial comparing an asynchronous remotely-delivered versus clinic-delivered lifestyle intervention.

Pagoto S, Goetz J, Xu R, Wang M, Palmer L, Lemon S Int J Obes (Lond). 2024; 49(1):76-83.

PMID: 39191926 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01617-0.


Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care.

Karampatakis G, Wood H, Griffiths C, Lea N, Ashcroft R, Day B J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e44886.

PMID: 37756051 PMC: 10568391. DOI: 10.2196/44886.


Delivering a Postpartum Weight Loss Intervention via Facebook or In-Person Groups: Results From a Randomized Pilot Feasibility Trial.

Waring M, Pagoto S, Moore Simas T, Blackman Carr L, Eamiello M, Libby B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023; 11:e41545.

PMID: 37103991 PMC: 10176149. DOI: 10.2196/41545.


References
1.
Hwang K, Ottenbacher A, Lucke J, Etchegaray J, Graham A, Thomas E . Measuring social support for weight loss in an internet weight loss community. J Health Commun. 2010; 16(2):198-211. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2010.535106. View

2.
Hales S, Davidson C, Turner-McGrievy G . Varying social media post types differentially impacts engagement in a behavioral weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2015; 4(4):355-62. PMC: 4286554. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0274-z. View

3.
Pagoto S, Schneider K, Oleski J, Luciani J, Bodenlos J, Whited M . Male inclusion in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle weight loss interventions. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 20(6):1234-9. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2011.140. View

4.
Patrick K, Marshall S, Davila E, Kolodziejczyk J, Fowler J, Calfas K . Design and implementation of a randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART). Contemp Clin Trials. 2013; 37(1):10-8. PMC: 3910290. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.001. View

5.
. The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(12):2165-71. PMC: 1282458. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2165. View