» Articles » PMID: 26498736

Impact of Price Display on Provider Ordering: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Hosp Med
Publisher Wiley
Date 2015 Oct 27
PMID 26498736
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Displaying order prices to physicians is 1 potential strategy to reduce unnecessary health expenditures, but its impact on patterns of care is unclear.

Objective: To review characteristics of previous price display interventions, impact on order costs and volume, effects on patient safety, acceptability to physicians, and the quality of this evidence.

Design: Systematic review of studies that showed numeric prices of laboratory tests, imaging studies, or medications to providers in real time during the ordering process and evaluated the impact on provider ordering. Two investigators independently extracted data for each study and evaluated study quality using a modified Downs and Black checklist.

Results: Of 1494 studies reviewed, 19 met inclusion criteria, including 5 randomized trials, 13 pre-post intervention studies, and 1 time series analysis. Studies were published between 1983 and 2014. Of 15 studies reporting the quantitative impact of price display on aggregate order costs or volume, 10 demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the intervention group. Price display was found to decrease aggregate order costs (9 of 13 studies) more frequently than order volume (3 of 8 studies). Patient safety was evaluated in 5 studies and was unaffected by price display. Provider acceptability tended to be positive, although evidence was limited. Study quality was mixed, with checklist scores ranging from 5/21 to 20/21.

Conclusions: Provider price display likely reduces order costs to a modest degree. Patient safety appeared unchanged, though evidence was limited. More high-quality evidence is needed to confirm these findings within a modern context.

Citing Articles

Cost awareness among intensivists in their daily clinical practice: a prospective multicentre study.

Lehut T, Lambert C, Mortier R, Futier E, Chabanne R, Bauer U Eur J Health Econ. 2024; 25(9):1529-1537.

PMID: 38472725 PMC: 11512858. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01686-y.


Interventions to improve appropriateness of laboratory testing in the intensive care unit: a narrative review.

Devis L, Catry E, Honore P, Mansour A, Lippi G, Mullier F Ann Intensive Care. 2024; 14(1):9.

PMID: 38224401 PMC: 10789714. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01244-y.


Effectiveness of non-interruptive nudge interventions in electronic health records to improve the delivery of care in hospitals: a systematic review.

Raban M, Gates P, Gamboa S, Gonzalez G, Westbrook J J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(7):1313-1322.

PMID: 37187160 PMC: 10280359. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad083.


Targeting repetitive laboratory testing with electronic health records-embedded predictive decision support: A pre-implementation study.

Rabbani N, Ma S, Li R, Winget M, Weber S, Boosi S Clin Biochem. 2023; 113:70-77.

PMID: 36623759 PMC: 9936847. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2023.01.002.


Displaying Cost and Completion Time for Reference Laboratory Test Orders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ikoma S, Pierce L, Bell D, Cheng E, Drake T, Guo R Appl Clin Inform. 2022; 13(3):656-664.

PMID: 35580621 PMC: 9259202. DOI: 10.1055/a-1854-4253.