» Articles » PMID: 26494178

Effects of Nutrient Profiling and Price Changes Based on NuVal® Scores on Food Purchasing in an Online Experimental Supermarket

Overview
Date 2015 Oct 24
PMID 26494178
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The goal of the present study was to apply experimental economic methods in an online supermarket to examine the effects of nutrient profiling, and differential pricing based on the nutrient profile, on the overall diet quality, energy and macronutrients of the foods purchased, and diet cost.

Design: Participants were provided nutrient profiling scores or price adjustments based on nutrient profile scores while completing a hypothetical grocery shopping task. Prices of foods in the top 20 % of nutrient profiling scores were reduced (subsidized) by 25 % while those in the bottom 20 % of scores were increased (taxed) by 25 %. We evaluated the independent and interactive effects of nutrient profiling or price adjustments on overall diet quality of foods purchased as assessed by the NuVal® score, energy and macronutrients purchased and diet cost in a 2×2 factorial design.

Setting: A large (>10 000 food items) online experimental supermarket in the USA.

Subjects: Seven hundred and eighty-one women.

Results: Providing nutrient profiling scores improved overall diet quality of foods purchased. Price changes were associated with an increase in protein purchased, an increase in energy cost, and reduced carbohydrate and protein costs. Price changes and nutrient profiling combined were associated with no unique benefits beyond price changes or nutrient profiling alone.

Conclusions: Providing nutrient profile score increased overall NuVal® score without a reduction in energy purchased. Combining nutrient profiling and price changes did not show an overall benefit to diet quality and may be less useful than nutrient profiling alone to consumers who want to increase overall diet quality of foods purchased.

Citing Articles

Effect of Financial Incentives and Default Options on Food Choices of Adults With Low Income in Online Retail Settings: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rummo P, Roberto C, Thorpe L, Troxel A, Elbel B JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(3):e232371.

PMID: 36897592 PMC: 10789116. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2371.


Change in the Healthiness of Foods Sold in an Australian Supermarket Chain Following Implementation of a Shelf Tag Intervention Based on the Health Star Rating System.

Cameron A, Brown A, Orellana L, Marshall J, Charlton E, Ngan W Nutrients. 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 35745125 PMC: 9229209. DOI: 10.3390/nu14122394.


Cost-Benefit and Cost-Utility Analyses to Demonstrate the Potential Value-for-Money of Supermarket Shelf Tags Promoting Healthier Packaged Products in Australia.

Ananthapavan J, Sacks G, Orellana L, Marshall J, Robinson E, Moodie M Nutrients. 2022; 14(9).

PMID: 35565886 PMC: 9103654. DOI: 10.3390/nu14091919.


An equity-oriented systematic review of online grocery shopping among low-income populations: implications for policy and research.

Trude A, Lowery C, Ali S, Vedovato G Nutr Rev. 2022; 80(5):1294-1310.

PMID: 35076065 PMC: 8990744. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab122.


A Standardized Guide to Developing an Online Grocery Store for Testing Nutrition-Related Policies and Interventions in an Online Setting.

Rummo P, Higgins I, Chauvenet C, Vesely A, Jaacks L, Taillie L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(9).

PMID: 33923246 PMC: 8123213. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094527.


References
1.
Marshall T . Exploring a fiscal food policy: the case of diet and ischaemic heart disease. BMJ. 2000; 320(7230):301-5. PMC: 1117490. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7230.301. View

2.
Jacobson M, Brownell K . Small taxes on soft drinks and snack foods to promote health. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90(6):854-7. PMC: 1446261. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.854. View

3.
Hinson J, Jameson T, Whitney P . Impulsive decision making and working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(2):298-306. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.298. View

4.
Drewnowski A . Obesity and the food environment: dietary energy density and diet costs. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3 Suppl):154-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.011. View

5.
Finkelstein E, French S, Variyam J, Haines P . Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3 Suppl):163-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.06.017. View