» Articles » PMID: 26493546

Inverse Relationship Between Chitobiase and Transglycosylation Activities of Chitinase-D from Serratia Proteamaculans Revealed by Mutational and Biophysical Analyses

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Oct 24
PMID 26493546
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Serratia proteamaculans chitinase-D (SpChiD) has a unique combination of hydrolytic and transglycosylation (TG) activities. The TG activity of SpChiD can be used for large-scale production of chito-oligosaccharides (CHOS). The multiple activities (hydrolytic and/or chitobiase activities and TG) of SpChiD appear to be strongly influenced by the substrate-binding cleft. Here, we report the unique property of SpChiD substrate-binding cleft, wherein, the residues Tyr28, Val35 and Thr36 control chitobiase activity and the residues Trp160 and Trp290 are crucial for TG activity. Mutants with reduced (V35G and T36G/F) or no (SpChiDΔ30-42 and Y28A) chitobiase activity produced higher amounts of the quantifiable even-chain TG product with degree of polymerization (DP)-6, indicating that the chitobiase and TG activities are inversely related. In addition to its unprecedented catalytic properties, unlike other chitinases, the single modular SpChiD showed dual unfolding transitions. Ligand-induced thermal stability studies with the catalytically inactive mutant of SpChiD (E153A) showed that the transition temperature increased upon binding of CHOS with DP2-6. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments revealed the exceptionally high binding affinities for E153A to CHOS with DP2-6. These observations strongly support that the architecture of SpChiD substrate-binding cleft adopted to control chitobiase and TG activities, in addition to usual chitinase-mediated hydrolysis.

Citing Articles

A novel lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase from enrichment microbiota and its application for shrimp shell powder biodegradation.

Zhang Y, Pan D, Xiao P, Xu Q, Geng F, Zhang X Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1097492.

PMID: 37007517 PMC: 10057547. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1097492.


Crystal structures of the GH18 domain of the bifunctional peroxiredoxin-chitinase CotE from Clostridium difficile.

Whittingham J, Hanai S, Brannigan J, Ferreira W, Dodson E, Turkenburg J Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun. 2020; 76(Pt 6):241-249.

PMID: 32510464 PMC: 7278498. DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X20006147.


Transglycosylation by a chitinase from Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae generates longer chitin oligosaccharides.

Mallakuntla M, Vaikuntapu P, Bhuvanachandra B, Das S, Podile A Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5113.

PMID: 28698589 PMC: 5505975. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05140-3.


Structure, Catalysis, and Inhibition of Chi-h, the Lepidoptera-exclusive Insect Chitinase.

Liu T, Chen L, Zhou Y, Jiang X, Duan Y, Yang Q J Biol Chem. 2017; 292(6):2080-2088.

PMID: 28053084 PMC: 5313083. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.755330.

References
1.
Mark B, Vocadlo D, Knapp S, Withers S, James M . Crystallographic evidence for substrate-assisted catalysis in a bacterial beta-hexosaminidase. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276(13):10330-7. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M011067200. View

2.
Lonhienne T, Mavromatis K, Vorgias C, Buchon L, Gerday C, Bouriotis V . Cloning, sequences, and characterization of two chitinase genes from the Antarctic Arthrobacter sp. strain TAD20: isolation and partial characterization of the enzymes. J Bacteriol. 2001; 183(5):1773-9. PMC: 95064. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.5.1773-1779.2001. View

3.
Lonhienne T, Zoidakis J, Vorgias C, Feller G, Gerday C, Bouriotis V . Modular structure, local flexibility and cold-activity of a novel chitobiase from a psychrophilic Antarctic bacterium. J Mol Biol. 2001; 310(2):291-7. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4774. View

4.
van Aalten D, Komander D, Synstad B, Gaseidnes S, Peter M, Eijsink V . Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of a family 18 exo-chitinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(16):8979-84. PMC: 55359. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.151103798. View

5.
Tharanathan R, Kittur F . Chitin--the undisputed biomolecule of great potential. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2003; 43(1):61-87. DOI: 10.1080/10408690390826455. View