» Articles » PMID: 26487512

Incremental Diagnostic Utility of Gastric Distension FDG PET/CT

Overview
Date 2015 Oct 22
PMID 26487512
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic utility of gastric distension (GD) FDG PET/CT in both patients with known gastric malignancy and those not known to have gastric malignancy but with incidental focal FDG uptake in the stomach.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 88 patients who underwent FDG PET/CT following GD with hyoscine N-butylbromide (Buscopan®) and water ingestion as part of routine clinical evaluation between 2004 and 2014. FDG PET/CT scans before and after GD were reported blinded to the patient clinical details in 49 patients undergoing pretreatment staging of gastric malignancy and 39 patients who underwent GD following incidental suspicious gastric uptake. The PET findings were validated by a composite clinical standard.

Results: In the 49 patients undergoing pretreatment staging of gastric malignancy, GD improved PET detection of the primary tumour (from 80 % to 90 %). PET evaluation of tumour extent was concordant with endoscopic/surgical reports in 31 % (interpreter 1) and 45 % (interpreter 2) using pre-GD images and 73 % and 76 % using GD images. Interobserver agreement also improved with GD (κ = 0.29 to 0.69). Metabolic and morphological quantitative analysis demonstrated a major impact of GD in normal gastric wall but no significant effect in tumour, except a minor increase in SUV related to a delayed acquisition time. The tumour to normal stomach SUVmax ratio increased from 3.8 ± 2.9 to 9.2 ± 8.6 (mean ± SD) with GD (p < 0.0001), facilitating detection and improved assessment of the primary tumour. In 25 (64 %) of the 39 patients with incidental suspicious gastric uptake, acquisition after GD correctly excluded a malignant process. In 10 (71 %) of the remaining 14 patients with persistent suspicious FDG uptake despite GD, malignancy was confirmed and in 3 (21 %) an active but benign pathology was diagnosed.

Conclusion: GD is a simple way to improve local staging with FDG PET in patients with gastric malignancy. In the setting of incidental suspicious gastric uptake, GD is also an effective tool for ruling out malignancy and leads to the avoidance of unnecessary endoscopy.

Citing Articles

F-FDG PET/CT findings in a mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma patient coexisting with primary myelofibrosis.

Han Y, Wu R, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Gao Z Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; 14(6):365-370.

PMID: 39840377 PMC: 11744357. DOI: 10.62347/BZUZ7442.


The effect of butylscopolamine on [F]FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract is negligible and regionally variable.

Guhne F, Ndum F, Seifert P, Winkens T, Drescher R, Freesmeyer M EJNMMI Res. 2023; 13(1):61.

PMID: 37340145 PMC: 10281937. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01012-2.


Utility of [Ga]FAPI-04 and [F]FDG dual-tracer PET/CT in the initial evaluation of gastric cancer.

Miao Y, Feng R, Guo R, Huang X, Hai W, Li J Eur Radiol. 2022; 33(6):4355-4366.

PMID: 36522509 PMC: 10182135. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09321-1.


Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Jayaprakasam V, Paroder V, Schoder H Semin Nucl Med. 2021; 51(5):485-501.

PMID: 33965198 PMC: 8338802. DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.04.001.


The utility of pharmacological and radiological interventions to optimize diagnostic information from PET/CT.

Dudoignon D, Pattison D, Legallois D, Hicks R, Aide N Cancer Imaging. 2020; 20(1):68.

PMID: 32962752 PMC: 7510123. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00344-9.


References
1.
Oda I, Saito D, Tada M, Iishi H, Tanabe S, Oyama T . A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2007; 9(4):262-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-006-0389-0. View

2.
Kamimura K, Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, Fujita S, Nishii R, Umemura Y . Role of gastric distention with additional water in differentiating locally advanced gastric carcinomas from physiological uptake in the stomach on 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2009; 30(6):431-9. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283299a2f. View

3.
Wagner J, Aron D . Incidentalomas: a "disease" of modern imaging technology. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 26(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2011.08.006. View

4.
Lee S, Lee W, Yoon H, Lee H, Lee K, Kim Y . Regional PET/CT after water gastric inflation for evaluating loco-regional disease of gastric cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(6):935-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.014. View

5.
Shimada H, Okazumi S, Koyama M, Murakami K . Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Task Force for Research Promotion: clinical utility of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gastric cancer. A systematic review of the literature. Gastric Cancer. 2011; 14(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0017-5. View