» Articles » PMID: 26487411

Modelling Farm Animal Welfare

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2015 Oct 22
PMID 26487411
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of models in the life sciences has greatly expanded in scope and advanced in technique in recent decades. However, the range, type and complexity of models used in farm animal welfare is comparatively poor, despite the great scope for use of modeling in this field of research. In this paper, we review the different modeling approaches used in farm animal welfare science to date, discussing the types of questions they have been used to answer, the merits and problems associated with the method, and possible future applications of each technique. We find that the most frequently published types of model used in farm animal welfare are conceptual and assessment models; two types of model that are frequently (though not exclusively) based on expert opinion. Simulation, optimization, scenario, and systems modeling approaches are rarer in animal welfare, despite being commonly used in other related fields. Finally, common issues such as a lack of quantitative data to parameterize models, and model selection and validation are discussed throughout the review, with possible solutions and alternative approaches suggested.

Citing Articles

Time series (ARIMA) as a tool to predict the temperature-humidity index in the dairy region of the northern desert of Mexico.

Herrera-Gonzalez J, Rodriguez-Venegas R, Legarreta-Gonzalez M, Robles-Trillo P, De-Santiago-Miramontes A, Loya-Gonzalez D PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18744.

PMID: 39713132 PMC: 11662903. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18744.


Computational animal welfare: towards cognitive architecture models of animal sentience, emotion and wellbeing.

Budaev S, Kristiansen T, Giske J, Eliassen S R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 7(12):201886.

PMID: 33489298 PMC: 7813262. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201886.


Broiler welfare trade-off: A semi-quantitative welfare assessment for optimised welfare improvement based on an expert survey.

Bracke M, Koene P, Estevez I, Butterworth A, de Jong I PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0222955.

PMID: 31574105 PMC: 6772121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222955.


A Prototype Tool to Enable Farmers to Measure and Improve the Welfare Performance of the Farm Animal Enterprise: The Unified Field Index.

Colditz I, Ferguson D, Collins T, Matthews L, Hemsworth P Animals (Basel). 2015; 4(3):446-62.

PMID: 26480317 PMC: 4494315. DOI: 10.3390/ani4030446.

References
1.
Botreau R, Bracke M, Perny P, Butterworth A, Capdeville J, van Reenen C . Aggregation of measures to produce an overall assessment of animal welfare. Part 2: analysis of constraints. Animal. 2012; 1(8):1188-97. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731107000547. View

2.
Bracke M, Edwards S, Metz J, Noordhuizen J, Algers B . Synthesis of semantic modelling and risk analysis methodology applied to animal welfare. Animal. 2012; 2(7):1061-72. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108002139. View

3.
Vernon M, Keeling M . Representing the UK's cattle herd as static and dynamic networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 276(1656):469-76. PMC: 2592553. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1009. View

4.
Mollenhorst H, Berentsen P, de Boer I . On-farm quantification of sustainability indicators: an application to egg production systems. Br Poult Sci. 2006; 47(4):405-17. DOI: 10.1080/00071660600829282. View

5.
Butcher E . Can cell systems biology rescue drug discovery?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005; 4(6):461-7. DOI: 10.1038/nrd1754. View