» Articles » PMID: 26487293

Prevalence of Chronic Low Back Pain: Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Oct 22
PMID 26487293
Citations 280
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To estimate worldwide prevalence of chronic low back pain according to age and sex.

Methods: We consulted Medline (PubMed), LILACS and EMBASE electronic databases. The search strategy used the following descriptors and combinations: back pain, prevalence, musculoskeletal diseases, chronic musculoskeletal pain, rheumatic, low back pain, musculoskeletal disorders and chronic low back pain. We selected cross-sectional population-based or cohort studies that assessed chronic low back pain as an outcome. We also assessed the quality of the selected studies as well as the chronic low back pain prevalence according to age and sex.

Results: The review included 28 studies. Based on our qualitative evaluation, around one third of the studies had low scores, mainly due to high non-response rates. Chronic low back pain prevalence was 4.2% in individuals aged between 24 and 39 years old and 19.6% in those aged between 20 and 59. Of nine studies with individuals aged 18 and above, six reported chronic low back pain between 3.9% and 10.2% and three, prevalence between 13.1% and 20.3%. In the Brazilian older population, chronic low back pain prevalence was 25.4%.

Conclusions: Chronic low back pain prevalence increases linearly from the third decade of life on, until the 60 years of age, being more prevalent in women. Methodological approaches aiming to reduce high heterogeneity in case definitions of chronic low back pain are essential to consistency and comparative analysis between studies. A standard chronic low back pain definition should include the precise description of the anatomical area, pain duration and limitation level.

Citing Articles

The effect of height of lifting on dynamic postural control in low back pain patients and healthy subjects.

Shahbazi M, Sarrafzadeh J, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Negahban H Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025; 70(4):460-467.

PMID: 40028402 PMC: 11868857. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12768.


Effect of a Healing Program Using Marine Resources on Reducing Pain and Improving Physical Function in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study.

Baek J, Kim S, Shin H, Cho H Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005290 PMC: 11857313. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020172.


Multimodal abnormalities of brain function in chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Chen X, Chen N, Lai P, Sun Y, Yu J, Xin M Front Neurosci. 2025; 19:1535288.

PMID: 39975971 PMC: 11836031. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1535288.


Comparisons of the effects of psychologically-informed and usual physiotherapy on pain sensitivity in chronic low back pain: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

Masse-Alarie H, Desgagnes A, Cote-Picard C, Liberty O, Langevin P, Piche M Arch Physiother. 2025; 15:32-41.

PMID: 39974748 PMC: 11836659. DOI: 10.33393/aop.2025.3323.


Musculoskeletal pain associated with common mental disorders among bus terminal workers in Brazil.

Rocha S, Rocha H, Giacomini S, Diaz A, Correia L Rev Bras Med Trab. 2025; 22(4):e20241301.

PMID: 39958429 PMC: 11822967. DOI: 10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1301.


References
1.
Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand M, Champagne F, Stock S . Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59(12):807-15. PMC: 1763600. DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.12.807. View

2.
Picavet H, Schouten J . Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2003; 102(1-2):167-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00372-x. View

3.
Cozzensa da Silva M, Fassa A, Valle N . [Chronic low back pain in a Southern Brazilian adult population: prevalence and associated factors]. Cad Saude Publica. 2004; 20(2):377-85. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2004000200005. View

4.
Brattberg G, Thorslund M, Wikman A . The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden. Pain. 1989; 37(2):215-222. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90133-4. View

5.
Jacobsson L, Lindgarde F, Manthorpe R . The commonest rheumatic complaints of over six weeks' duration in a twelve-month period in a defined Swedish population. Prevalences and relationships. Scand J Rheumatol. 1989; 18(6):353-60. DOI: 10.3109/03009748909102096. View