Exploring Strategies Used Following a Group-based Fatigue Management Programme for People with Multiple Sclerosis (FACETS) Via the Fatigue Management Strategies Questionnaire (FMSQ)

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2015 Oct 22

PMID 26486976

Citations 6

Authors

S Thomas

P Kersten

P W Thomas

V Slingsby

A Nock

R Jones

A Davies Smith

K T Galvin

R Baker

C Hillier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore cross-sectional patterns of use of fatigue management strategies in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) who had attended a group-based fatigue management programme, Fatigue: Applying Cognitive behavioural and Energy effectiveness Techniques to lifeStyle ('FACETS'). In a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) the FACETS programme was shown to reduce fatigue severity and improve self-efficacy and quality of life.

Design: A questionnaire substudy within a RCT involving the self-completed Fatigue Management Strategies Questionnaire (FMSQ). The FMSQ includes: (1) closed questions about the use and helpfulness of fatigue management strategies taught in FACETS and (2) open items about changes to lifestyle, attitudes or expectations, barriers or difficulties encountered and helpful strategies not covered in FACETS.

Participants: All had a clinical diagnosis of MS, significant fatigue, were ambulatory and had attended at least 4 of 6 scheduled FACETS sessions.

Methods: Participants (n=72) were posted the FMSQ with a prepaid return envelope 4 months after the end of the FACETS programme.

Results: 82% (59/72) of participants returned the FMSQ. The fatigue management strategies most frequently used since attending FACETS were prioritisation (80%), pacing (78%), saying no to others (78%), grading tasks (75%) and challenging unhelpful thoughts (71%). Adding in those participants who were already using the respective strategies prior to FACETS, the three most used strategies at 4 months were prioritisation (55/59), grading (54/59) and pacing (53/58). Free-text comments illustrated the complex interplay between attitudes/expectations, behaviours, emotions and the environment. Issues related to expectations featured strongly in participants' comments. Expectations (from self and others) were both facilitators and barriers to effective fatigue management.

Conclusions: Individuals' comments highlighted the complex, multifaceted nature of fatigue management. Revising expectations and a greater acceptance of fatigue were important shifts following the programme. Findings support the relevance of a cognitive behavioural approach for fatigue management. Booster sessions might be a useful addition to the FACETS programme.

Trial Registration Number: Current controlled trials ISRCTN76517470; Results.

Citing Articles

Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue Self-Management: Strategies and Influencing Factors 5 Years After a Multimodal Intervention.

Silverman S, Yang B, Mata-Greve F, Sajeev N, Samiee S, Norton J Int J MS Care. 2024; 26(Q4):363-369.

PMID: 39719964 PMC: 11667032. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-012.

Experienced fatigue in people with rare disorders: a scoping review on characteristics of existing research.

Bathen T, Johansen H, Stromme H, Velvin G Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022; 17(1):14.

PMID: 35012596 PMC: 8751355. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-02169-6.

Creating a Digital Toolkit to Reduce Fatigue and Promote Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: Participatory Design and Usability Study.

Thomas S, Pulman A, Dogan H, Jiang N, Passmore D, Pretty K JMIR Form Res. 2021; 5(12):e19230.

PMID: 34889744 PMC: 8704114. DOI: 10.2196/19230.

Finding the right balance with participation in exercise and sport for individuals with multiple sclerosis: protocol for a pre and post intervention feasibility study.

Smith M, Williams G, Barker R BMJ Open. 2020; 10(3):e035378.

PMID: 32193273 PMC: 7150603. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035378.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a 3-Week Inpatient Energy Management Education Program for People with Multiple Sclerosis-Related Fatigue.

Hersche R, Weise A, Michel G, Kesselring J, Barbero M, Kool J Int J MS Care. 2020; 21(6):265-274.

PMID: 31889931 PMC: 6928585. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-058.

References

Costello K, Harris C . Differential diagnosis and management of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: considerations for the nurse. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003; 35(3):139-48. DOI: 10.1097/01376517-200306000-00003. View

van Kessel K, Moss-Morris R . Understanding multiple sclerosis fatigue: a synthesis of biological and psychological factors. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 61(5):583-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.03.006. View

Skerrett T, Moss-Morris R . Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients' cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 61(5):587-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.018. View

Orme M, Kerrigan J, Tyas D, Russell N, Nixon R . The effect of disease, functional status, and relapses on the utility of people with multiple sclerosis in the UK. Value Health. 2007; 10(1):54-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00144.x. View

Matuska K, Mathiowetz V, Finlayson M . Use and perceived effectiveness of energy conservation strategies for managing multiple sclerosis fatigue. Am J Occup Ther. 2007; 61(1):62-9. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.61.1.62. View

Kos D, Kerckhofs E, Nagels G, Dhooghe M, Ilsbroukx S . Origin of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: review of the literature. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007; 22(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1177/1545968306298934. View

Lee D, Newell R, Ziegler L, Topping A . Treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008; 14(2):81-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00670.x. View

Branas P, Jordan R, Fry-Smith A, Burls A, Hyde C . Treatments for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2000; 4(27):1-61. View

Raggi A, Covelli V, Schiavolin S, Scaratti C, Leonardi M, Willems M . Work-related problems in multiple sclerosis: a literature review on its associates and determinants. Disabil Rehabil. 2015; 38(10):936-44. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1070295. View

10.

Schwartz J, Jandorf L, Krupp L . The measurement of fatigue: a new instrument. J Psychosom Res. 1993; 37(7):753-62. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90104-n. View

11.

Mallik P, Finlayson M, Mathiowetz V, Fogg L . Psychometric evaluation of the Energy Conservation Strategies Survey. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(5):538-43. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr789oa. View

12.

Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

13.

White C, White M, Russell C . Invisible and visible symptoms of multiple sclerosis: which are more predictive of health distress?. J Neurosci Nurs. 2008; 40(2):85-95, 102. DOI: 10.1097/01376517-200804000-00007. View

14.

Thomas S, Thomas P, Nock A, Slingsby V, Galvin K, Baker R . Development and preliminary evaluation of a cognitive behavioural approach to fatigue management in people with multiple sclerosis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(2):240-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.001. View

15.

Thomas P, Thomas S, Kersten P, Jones R, Nock A, Slingsby V . Multi-centre parallel arm randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based cognitive behavioural approach to managing fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2010; 10:43. PMC: 2905353. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-43. View

16.

Braley T, Chervin R . Fatigue in multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, evaluation, and treatment. Sleep. 2010; 33(8):1061-7. PMC: 2910465. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/33.8.1061. View

17.

Polman C, Reingold S, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen J, Filippi M . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011; 69(2):292-302. PMC: 3084507. DOI: 10.1002/ana.22366. View

18.

Besharat M, Pourhosein R, Rostami R, Bazzazian S . Perfectionism and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Psychol Health. 2010; 26(4):419-32. DOI: 10.1080/08870440903464228. View

19.

Dures E, Kitchen K, Almeida C, Ambler N, Cliss A, Hammond A . "They didn't tell us, they made us work it out ourselves": patient perspectives of a cognitive-behavioral program for rheumatoid arthritis fatigue. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 64(4):494-501. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21562. View

20.

Dures E, Hewlett S . Cognitive-behavioural approaches to self-management in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012; 8(9):553-9. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.108. View