» Articles » PMID: 26483854

Electronic Acquisition of OSCE Performance Using Tablets

Overview
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2015 Oct 21
PMID 26483854
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) often involve a considerable amount of resources in terms of materials and organization since the scores are often recorded on paper. Computer-assisted administration is an alternative with which the need for material resources can be reduced. In particular, the use of tablets seems sensible because these are easy to transport and flexible to use.

Aim: User acceptance concerning the use of tablets during OSCEs has not yet been extensively investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate tablet-based OSCEs from the perspective of the user (examiner) and the student examinee.

Method: For two OSCEs in Internal Medicine at the University of Heidelberg, user acceptance was analyzed regarding tablet-based administration (satisfaction with functionality) and the subjective amount of effort as perceived by the examiners. Standardized questionnaires and semi-standardized interviews were conducted (complete survey of all participating examiners). In addition, for one OSCE, the subjective evaluation of this mode of assessment was gathered from a random sample of participating students in semi-standardized interviews.

Results: Overall, the examiners were very satisfied with using tablets during the assessment. The subjective amount of effort to use the tablet was found on average to be "hardly difficult". The examiners identified the advantages of this mode of administration as being in particular the ease of use and low rate of error. During the interviews of the examinees, acceptance for the use of tablets during the assessment was also detected.

Discussion: Overall, it was found that the use of tablets during OSCEs was well accepted by both examiners and examinees. We expect that this mode of assessment also offers advantages regarding assessment documentation, use of resources, and rate of error in comparison with paper-based assessments; all of these aspects should be followed up on in further studies.

Citing Articles

Crowdsource authoring as a tool for enhancing the quality of competency assessments in healthcare professions.

Lin C, Clinciu D, Salcedo D, Huang C, Kang E, Li Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0278571.

PMID: 37917751 PMC: 10621860. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278571.


Development and Integration of DOPS as Formative Tests in Head and Neck Ultrasound Education: Proof of Concept Study for Exploration of Perceptions.

Weimer J, Rink M, Muller L, Dirks K, Ille C, Bozzato A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832149 PMC: 9954978. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040661.


Advances in delivery methods of (spirulina) for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.

Elfar O, Billa N, Lim H, Chew K, Cheah W, Munawaroh H Bioengineered. 2022; 13(6):14681-14718.

PMID: 35946342 PMC: 9373759. DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2100863.


Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam.

Wagner F, Feller S, Schmitz F, Zimmermann P, Krings R, Guttormsen S GMS J Med Educ. 2022; 39(2):Doc24.

PMID: 35692359 PMC: 9174065. DOI: 10.3205/zma001545.


Using mobile technology to enhance medical student assessment.

Sinha S, McRobbie S, Meldrum A, Brown C, Denison A BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2022; 3(2):77-78.

PMID: 35520996 PMC: 8936774. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000188.


References
1.
Patricio M, Juliao M, Fareleira F, Vaz Carneiro A . Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?. Med Teach. 2013; 35(6):503-14. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774330. View

2.
Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moltner A, Schultz J, Norcini J, Tekian A . Good exams made easy: the item management system for multiple examination formats. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12:63. PMC: 3441576. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-63. View

3.
Amin Z, Boulet J, Cook D, Ellaway R, Fahal A, Kneebone R . Technology-enabled assessment of health professions education: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011; 33(5):364-9. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565832. View

4.
Kruppa E, Junger J, Nikendei C . [Innovative teaching and examination methods--taking stock at German medical faculties]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009; 134(8):371-2. DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1124008. View

5.
Ruderich F, Bauch M, Haag M, Heid J, Leven F, Singer R . CAMPUS--a flexible, interactive system for web-based, problem-based learning in health care. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004; 107(Pt 2):921-5. View